1996
DOI: 10.1007/s001220050130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intergeneric transfer of a partial genome and direct production of monosomic addition plants by microprotoplast fusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, in most cases the hybrids gained much more donor DNA than desired, resulting in an aberrant morphology and partially sterilility (Kovtun et al 1993;McCabe et al 1993), although a stable genomic transfer through asymmetric protoplast fusion has also been reported (Binsfeld et al 2000). Furthermore, asymmetric protoplast fusion has been successfully used for transfer of one or few chromosomes, the production of specific addition lines and the introgression of genes between sexually incompatible species (Ramulu et al 1996;Binsfeld et al 2000;Wardrop et al 2004;Chen et al 2004). Highly asymmetric fertile hybrids have only occasionally been described (Vlahova et al 1997;Xia et al 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unfortunately, in most cases the hybrids gained much more donor DNA than desired, resulting in an aberrant morphology and partially sterilility (Kovtun et al 1993;McCabe et al 1993), although a stable genomic transfer through asymmetric protoplast fusion has also been reported (Binsfeld et al 2000). Furthermore, asymmetric protoplast fusion has been successfully used for transfer of one or few chromosomes, the production of specific addition lines and the introgression of genes between sexually incompatible species (Ramulu et al 1996;Binsfeld et al 2000;Wardrop et al 2004;Chen et al 2004). Highly asymmetric fertile hybrids have only occasionally been described (Vlahova et al 1997;Xia et al 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This disadvantage might be avoided by asymmetric protoplast fusion, which is also called donor-recipient fusion. In this manner, only a part of the donor genome is transferred to a receptor protoplast (Ramulu et al 1996), reducing the number of undesirable traits incorporated into the receptor genome. For transferring partial genome or cytoplasm, the donor protoplast was usually irradiated with X-or gamma-rays (ionizing irradiation) prior to fusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most powerful aspect of somatic hybridization is the aneuploid resource. The hybrids may also prove useful for the production of monosomic or disomic addition plants by microprotoplast fusion and recombinant lines after backcrossing (Ramulu et al 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For successful application of somatic hybrids for improvement of cotton crops, backcrosses with the local cultivars will have to be performed to eliminate undesirable traits and sterility. The hybrids may also prove useful for the production of monosomic or disomic addition lines by microprotoplast fusion and recombinant lines after backcrossing (Ramulu et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%