Abstract:This paper examines intergenerational knowledge sharing within family firms in traditional industries. We position our analysis against the background of the knowledge-based view of the firm and utilize knowledge creation theory and perspectives on knowledge sharing behavior to analyse how knowledge is shared in an organization. We employ a multiple case study approach and use the New Zealand wine industry as the context of our analysis. Our study extends family business and knowledge sharing literature by cha… Show more
“…This finding might be informative to literature studying the willingness and ability of family firm owner‐managers to innovate (e.g., Chrisman et al, ) as it suggests that in case of family successions, successors might enjoy higher perceived ability to introduce changes to the product and service portfolio. In summary, our results thus extend the emerging stream of research on intergenerational succession and family firm (product) innovation (e.g., Chirico and Salvato, ; Hauck and Prügl, ; Kraiczy et al, ; Woodfield and Husted, ) by revealing how and under which conditions the predecessor’s board retention influences product innovation in family firms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Recently, scholars have started to devote their attention to the role of CEO succession in family firms for (product) innovation (Cabrera‐Suárez, García‐Almeida, and De Saá‐Pérez, ; Hauck and Prügl, ; Kraiczy et al, ; Woodfield and Husted, ). These studies indicate that CEO succession provides a “catalyst for change” (Kotlar and De Massis, , p. 29) and thus stimulates product innovation as successors tend to be more open toward new ideas and bring new knowledge to the family firm (Handler, ; Kraiczy et al, ; Salvato, ; Woodfield and Husted, ).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, scholars have started to devote their attention to the role of CEO succession in family firms for (product) innovation (Cabrera‐Suárez, García‐Almeida, and De Saá‐Pérez, ; Hauck and Prügl, ; Kraiczy et al, ; Woodfield and Husted, ). These studies indicate that CEO succession provides a “catalyst for change” (Kotlar and De Massis, , p. 29) and thus stimulates product innovation as successors tend to be more open toward new ideas and bring new knowledge to the family firm (Handler, ; Kraiczy et al, ; Salvato, ; Woodfield and Husted, ). In particular, next‐generation CEOs might be especially willing to introduce novel products as they aim to demonstrate their efficacy and worthiness, which they can particularly accomplish by initiating strategic change (Quigley and Hambrick, ) and product innovations (Le Breton‐Miller, Miller, and Steier, ; Woodfield and Husted, ).…”
Understanding product innovation in family firms is an important research endeavor given the economic predominance of those firms, their idiosyncrasies, and the importance of constant renewal for those firms to achieve transgenerational survival. Recently, family firm research has highlighted the role of next‐generation chief executive officers (CEOs; i.e., successors) who are often seen as drivers for innovating a family firm’s products. However, prior research has typically neglected that predecessors, who are often portrayed as less willing to introduce product innovation, frequently remain involved postsuccession through occupying board positions and thus still substantially influence the decision‐making processes and outcomes of family firms, such as product innovation. As a result, our understanding of the role of predecessors and their postsuccession involvement in family firms’ product innovation remains unclear. Building on stakeholder salience theory and on insights from the literature on innovation and succession in family firms, we develop hypotheses about how and under which conditions the predecessor’s board retention affects product innovation in family firms after succession. Building on more than 200 family firm CEO succession cases in small‐ and medium‐sized, privately owned family firms, our results reveal that the predecessor’s board retention negatively affects product innovation. This negative effect is strengthened with increasing involvement of the predecessor in the successor selection process, and it is offset in the case of family succession. Our findings contribute to the emerging stream of research on family firm succession and product innovation and provide important implications for practice.
“…This finding might be informative to literature studying the willingness and ability of family firm owner‐managers to innovate (e.g., Chrisman et al, ) as it suggests that in case of family successions, successors might enjoy higher perceived ability to introduce changes to the product and service portfolio. In summary, our results thus extend the emerging stream of research on intergenerational succession and family firm (product) innovation (e.g., Chirico and Salvato, ; Hauck and Prügl, ; Kraiczy et al, ; Woodfield and Husted, ) by revealing how and under which conditions the predecessor’s board retention influences product innovation in family firms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Recently, scholars have started to devote their attention to the role of CEO succession in family firms for (product) innovation (Cabrera‐Suárez, García‐Almeida, and De Saá‐Pérez, ; Hauck and Prügl, ; Kraiczy et al, ; Woodfield and Husted, ). These studies indicate that CEO succession provides a “catalyst for change” (Kotlar and De Massis, , p. 29) and thus stimulates product innovation as successors tend to be more open toward new ideas and bring new knowledge to the family firm (Handler, ; Kraiczy et al, ; Salvato, ; Woodfield and Husted, ).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, scholars have started to devote their attention to the role of CEO succession in family firms for (product) innovation (Cabrera‐Suárez, García‐Almeida, and De Saá‐Pérez, ; Hauck and Prügl, ; Kraiczy et al, ; Woodfield and Husted, ). These studies indicate that CEO succession provides a “catalyst for change” (Kotlar and De Massis, , p. 29) and thus stimulates product innovation as successors tend to be more open toward new ideas and bring new knowledge to the family firm (Handler, ; Kraiczy et al, ; Salvato, ; Woodfield and Husted, ). In particular, next‐generation CEOs might be especially willing to introduce novel products as they aim to demonstrate their efficacy and worthiness, which they can particularly accomplish by initiating strategic change (Quigley and Hambrick, ) and product innovations (Le Breton‐Miller, Miller, and Steier, ; Woodfield and Husted, ).…”
Understanding product innovation in family firms is an important research endeavor given the economic predominance of those firms, their idiosyncrasies, and the importance of constant renewal for those firms to achieve transgenerational survival. Recently, family firm research has highlighted the role of next‐generation chief executive officers (CEOs; i.e., successors) who are often seen as drivers for innovating a family firm’s products. However, prior research has typically neglected that predecessors, who are often portrayed as less willing to introduce product innovation, frequently remain involved postsuccession through occupying board positions and thus still substantially influence the decision‐making processes and outcomes of family firms, such as product innovation. As a result, our understanding of the role of predecessors and their postsuccession involvement in family firms’ product innovation remains unclear. Building on stakeholder salience theory and on insights from the literature on innovation and succession in family firms, we develop hypotheses about how and under which conditions the predecessor’s board retention affects product innovation in family firms after succession. Building on more than 200 family firm CEO succession cases in small‐ and medium‐sized, privately owned family firms, our results reveal that the predecessor’s board retention negatively affects product innovation. This negative effect is strengthened with increasing involvement of the predecessor in the successor selection process, and it is offset in the case of family succession. Our findings contribute to the emerging stream of research on family firm succession and product innovation and provide important implications for practice.
“…We selected this case study because Grotta del Sole is a typical family firm, based in the Campania region (south of Italy), which operates in one of the most relevant Italian industrial sectors: the wine industry. Even though winemaking is a traditional industry sector, it has had a wide and global renaissance, due to advances in science and technology which have largely improved the traditionally practice-based industry, at the same time increasing knowledge through formal education (Johnson and Robinson, 2007;Woodfield and Husted, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As far as the new management accounting practices became a shared "language" within the firm, family and non-family managers were provided with a set of categories that made sense of activities, at the same time improving communication and knowledge transfer (Roberts and Scapens, 1985). Furthermore, according to Woodfield and Husted (2017), this means that knowledge sharing in family firms leads to innovative outcomes and change.…”
Family business succession is considered inherent to family businesses and represents a critical process that is generally characterised by resistance to change. This study aims to investigate the role of management accounting systems (MASs) in family business succession, in order to understand how changes in MASs during the succession across different family generations can help the succession process itself, facilitating the rise of the new leader, supporting changes, and reducing resistance to them. The research adopts a case study approach, focusing on organizational routines and their changes, at the same time taking into account the socioemotional wealth of the family firm. Evidence from the study shows the strategic role of MAS in managing the succession process, through the implementation of new routines and rules in helping the decision-making process and in achieving the firm's leadership.
The majority of small-and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the wine industry are family owned and operated providing a unique organisational structure to study environmental sustainability engagement. However, researchers at the intersection of environmental sustainability (ES) and family businesses tend to oversimplify family businesses as homogeneous regarding ES. Therefore, the broader goal of this paper is to investigate the antecedents of heterogeneities among family firms related to ES. The paper aims to understand how family firms portray different aspects of family influence (family goals, family values, culture and ethics, and the imprints of the founders and the next generation) in their ES disclosures. Family logics are used as a theoretical lens to analyse family influence. A qualitative content analysis of 72 corporate websites of family firms operating in the New Zealand wine industry was conducted. Antecedents of heterogeneities were revealed with a discussion of three typologies of family firms: family first, business first and upstarts.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.