2019
DOI: 10.1002/jtr.2327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intergenerational differences in customer engagement behaviours: An analysis of social tourism websites

Abstract: This paper explores differences among Generations X, Y, and Z in customer engagement behaviours. Specifically, it analyses differences in customer behaviours in social tourism websites and the effects of self‐efficacy and satisfaction on these behaviours. On the basis of an empirical study with a sample of 346 social tourism websites users, the results show that, in Generation X, self‐efficacy exerts a higher effect on word of mouth than in the other generations. In Generation Y, satisfaction influences inform… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to loyalty behavior, different results have been reported with respect to it. While several authors [91][92][93] reported that there are significant differences among generational cohorts, the findings of other studies such as [94] did not support the hypothesis regarding the existence of a significant difference between generations in their loyalty behavior. In this sense, the author in [91] indicated that the effects of green satisfaction and green trust on guest loyalty measured through word of mouth intention were higher for Millennials in comparison to the non-Millennials group, whose age is older.…”
Section: Generational Cohortmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…With regard to loyalty behavior, different results have been reported with respect to it. While several authors [91][92][93] reported that there are significant differences among generational cohorts, the findings of other studies such as [94] did not support the hypothesis regarding the existence of a significant difference between generations in their loyalty behavior. In this sense, the author in [91] indicated that the effects of green satisfaction and green trust on guest loyalty measured through word of mouth intention were higher for Millennials in comparison to the non-Millennials group, whose age is older.…”
Section: Generational Cohortmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Generation Z customers-the generational cohort selected to study customer assessment of robots as a means of preventing COVID-19-are usually described as digital natives, fully connected virtually, technology open and savvy, and willing to accept innovative products and services (Băltescu, 2019;Bravo et al, 2020;Dimitriou and Abouelgheit, 2019). Research focusing on robots' acceptance by Generation Z is scarce.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generation Z constitutes an interesting group to study for several reasons. First, despite being an attractive market segment for hospitality firms as potential or actual high spenders (Dimitriou and Abouelgheit, 2019), they have seldom been researched in hospitality from a consumer perspective (e.g., Bravo et al, 2020;Haddouche and Salomone, 2018) and not regarding to service robot acceptance. Second, Generation Z members are technology savvy and use social media extensively (Turner, 2015), which makes them potential facilitators of robot diffusion.…”
Section: Service Robots and Covid-19: Exploring Perceptions Of Prevention Efficacy At Hotels In Generation Z 1 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the tourism industry, social media are favored not only by tourists but also by the tourism service providers as visitors may gather and exchange information instantly (Cabiddu et al, 2014;Leung et al, 2019;Kim and Chae, 2018). Currently, there is a proliferation of tourism studies that have defended the far-reaching effect of social media on customer engagement (Cabiddu et al, 2014;Sashi et al, 2019;Bravo et al, 2020). However, almost all current research fails to provide a thorough SMA analysis in the tourism context (Lee et al, 2018;Knoll, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%