Intergenerational Conflict at US Airlines: An Unresolved Oedipal Complex?

Abstract

Purpose-The purpose of this paper is to investigate how, if at all, organizational dynamics changed at US airlines after an industry wide modification to mandatory retirement age regulations in 2007. Findings challenge assumptions that society, organizations, and employees will all unequivocally benefit from abolishing mandatory retirement by investigating the impact of age-related policy changes on US airline pilots. Design/methodology/approach-In total, 43 semi-structured interviews were conducted with captains and copilots from US airlines between September 2010 and July 2011. From this data set, two informant subgroups emerged: first, senior captains averaging 59 years of age; and second, junior pilots averaging 43.5 years of age. Findings-Findings revealed that both senior and junior pilots reported retirement age policy changes created an antagonistic environment, pitting employees against each other in competition over scarce resources. Research limitations/implications-Paper findings are based on empirical materials collected during an 11 month snapshot-in-time between September 2010 and July 2011 and interview data are based on a small subgroup of US airline pilots who self-selected to participate in the study. Therefore, findings are not unbiased and may not be generalizable across all airlines' pilot workgroups. Practical implications-Considerable research has been conducted identifying the policy and practice changes that employers need to adopt to retain older workers. However, few studies consider the psychological impact of these age-related workplace changes on employees or the organizational psychodynamics they might trigger. Originality/value-This paper makes two main contributions. First, through use of the psychoanalytic construct of the Oedipus complex, the paper sheds light on some of the psychodynamic consequences of agerelated policy changes. Second, it challenges assumptions about workforce aging and the underlying causes of intergenerational conflict, highlighting ways that policy changes intended to eradicate discrimination against older workers can result in age discrimination against younger employees.

The idealization of ‘compassion’ in trainee nurses’ talk: A psychosocial focus group study

“…As such, our study suggests that the expectation to identify with ideals perpetuated by social or policy discourse provokes nurses to project unacceptable aspects onto others with whom they work closely (see Petriglieri and Stein, 2012: 1220). In line with research showing how policy changes may trigger antagonistic relationships at work (Fraher, 2017), we found that the compassion discourse produces othering, and obstructs the development of a sense of alliance with qualified nurses, despite the qualified nurses being exposed to similar obstacles and difficulties as the trainees. The lost opportunity for solidarity contributes to a perpetuating of the scapegoating of nursing failures for wider system problems and policy failures.…”