2019
DOI: 10.1111/ijpo.12585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intergenerational changes in adiposity and fat distribution from 1982 to 2011 in male children and adolescents from Kolkata (India)

Abstract: Background: India, as a developing country, is subjected to numerous socioeconomic changes. They can significantly influence human development and be mirrored by the secular trends regarding the adiposity and body fat distribution. Objectives: The aim of the study was to examine the intergenerational changes of adiposity and body fat distribution in Bengali boys, between 1982 and 2011. Methods: The study group consisted of 2064 Bengali boys, aged 7-16, from the middle-class families, examined in two cross-sect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to many authors, also directly measured skinfold thickness is a much better indicator of adiposity than the commonly used BMI (Kryst et al, 2020; Moreno et al, 2012). Therefore, the observation of changes in these features in children and adolescents is a recommended procedure aimed at early detection of overweight, obesity, as well as normal weight obesity or other diseases associated with metabolic disorders (Franco et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to many authors, also directly measured skinfold thickness is a much better indicator of adiposity than the commonly used BMI (Kryst et al, 2020; Moreno et al, 2012). Therefore, the observation of changes in these features in children and adolescents is a recommended procedure aimed at early detection of overweight, obesity, as well as normal weight obesity or other diseases associated with metabolic disorders (Franco et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%