2021
DOI: 10.7554/elife.73425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intergenerational adaptations to stress are evolutionarily conserved, stress-specific, and have deleterious trade-offs

Abstract: Despite reports of parental exposure to stress promoting physiological adaptations in progeny in diverse organisms, there remains considerable debate over the significance and evolutionary conservation of such multigenerational effects. Here, we investigate four independent models of intergenerational adaptations to stress in C. elegans - bacterial infection, eukaryotic infection, osmotic stress and nutrient stress - across multiple species. We found that all four intergenerational physiological adaptations ar… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(151 reference statements)
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the response to nodavirus infection is conserved between C. elegans and C. briggsae [38]. An intergenerational transcriptional response to Pseudomonas vranovensis was conserved between some, but not all species of Caenorhabditis [39]. A study looking at four different species of bacteria infecting the nematode Pristionchus pacificus also showed both similarities and differences between the transcriptional responses in the two hosts [40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the response to nodavirus infection is conserved between C. elegans and C. briggsae [38]. An intergenerational transcriptional response to Pseudomonas vranovensis was conserved between some, but not all species of Caenorhabditis [39]. A study looking at four different species of bacteria infecting the nematode Pristionchus pacificus also showed both similarities and differences between the transcriptional responses in the two hosts [40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example the response to nodavirus infection is conserved between C. elegans and C. briggsae (Chen et al ., 2017). An intergenerational transcriptional response to Pseudomonas vranovensis was conserved between some, but not all species of Caenorhabditis (Burton et al ., 2021). A study looking at different species of bacterial infection in the nematode Pristionchus pacificus also showed both similarities and differences between the transcriptional responses in the two hosts (Sinha et al ., 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it should be noted that the behavioural impacts of MSUS are largely in conflict with the accepted clinical outcomes associated with childhood maltreatment, namely increased risk for emotional and behavioural problems (Schickedanz et al., 2018), as well as increased risk for type 1 diabetes (Landolt et al., 2002; Rechenberg et al., 2017). It has been proposed that offspring phenotype changes reflect intergenerational adaptations to perceived environmental adversity (stress) to boost the prospect of species survival, not too dissimilar from what has been discovered recently in Caenorhabditis elegans (Burton et al., 2021). It is possible that epigenetic inheritance exists to prepare the MSUS offspring for stressful environments, conferring them an inherent ‘resilience’ without having to undergo the same physiological and behavioural adaptations as their stressed parents.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%