The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2008
DOI: 10.1177/0266242608088740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interfirm Cooperation among Small Manufacturing Firms

Abstract: This article evaluates interfirm cooperation among small manufacturing firms. Networks of small firms work together on numerous activities such as marketing, procurement or manufacturing; however, are certain `enablers' necessary for successful cooperation? To answer this question networking activities among small manufacturers were investigated. Over the course of 12 months 23 in-depth interviews were conducted: 7 with network brokers (network brokers identify opportunities, bring small firms together and fac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
86
0
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
5
86
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…These comments support the interpretation that there was a clear division of networking activities within DoArt, with staff directing their interactions towards others holding similar positions in their firms (Hanna and Walsh, 2008). This tripartite approach was also observed at events organised by DoArt and during time spent at their premises.…”
Section: Networking and Embedding Activitiessupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These comments support the interpretation that there was a clear division of networking activities within DoArt, with staff directing their interactions towards others holding similar positions in their firms (Hanna and Walsh, 2008). This tripartite approach was also observed at events organised by DoArt and during time spent at their premises.…”
Section: Networking and Embedding Activitiessupporting
confidence: 62%
“…This study reveals that the demarcation of networking activities according to existing hierarchies within the sector can help a new venture comply with industry norms (Hanna and Walsh, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Qualitative case study methods have been deemed suitable for exploring relationships and interaction processes between multiple actors residing in both the family and value chain (Irava and Moores, 2010;Jack et al, 2015) and are useful to gain a deep understanding of issues related to a complex social context (Jack et al, 2015;Yin, 2003). This approach fits with recent entrepreneurship and family business literature which supports the need for qualitative studies to be conducted to understand the complex and context dependent nature of relationships and networks (Hanna and Walsh, 2008;Jack, 2010;Leppäaho et al, 2015) and to empirically add to the current body of conceptual and theoretical work in the area of familiness (Carnes and Ireland, 2013;Sharma, 2008). This methodology has the unique strength of being able to deal with a full variety of evidence, including, but not limited to, documents, artefacts, interviews, and observations (Yin, 2003).…”
Section: Study Design and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Researchers, government bodies, and practitioners in general have been giving growing attention to cooperation networks and industrial clustering, due to the competitive advantage and regional development they enable [16,17,18,19]. Clusters are geographic concentrations of interconnected companies, specialised suppliers, service providers, firms in related industries, and associated institutions (e.g., universities, standard agencies, trade associations) in a particular field that compete but also cooperate [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%