2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.it.2015.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interferons and viruses: an evolutionary arms race of molecular interactions

Abstract: Over half a century has passed since interferons (IFNs) were discovered and shown to inhibit virus infection in cultured cells. Since then, researchers have steadily brought to light the molecular details of IFN signaling, catalogued their pleiotropic effects on cells, and harnessed their therapeutic potential for a variety of maladies. While advances have been plentiful, several fundamental questions have yet to be answered and much complexity remains to be unraveled. We explore the current knowledge surround… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
318
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 338 publications
(330 citation statements)
references
References 191 publications
(200 reference statements)
1
318
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is supported by the extensive retention of WGD-generated duplicates of CytoR signaling components compared with the average retention rate of just 3-4% (73) and is consistent with other studies indicating that WGDs played a crucial role in adaptive immunity by providing new genetic materials for a range of essential components (99). Additional evidence for immunity as a key driver can be gleaned from the significant divergence in the IFN-responsive CytoRs between teleosts and tetrapods (51), likely as a result of the powerful selective forces associated with combatting everchanging pathogens, particularly viruses, which develop subversion mechanisms to counter the antiviral effects of IFNs in fish and mammals (53,80,100). This is borne out, for example, by other data showing that the majority of type I IFNs have been subjected to purifying selection (101).…”
Section: Consequences and Driversmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is supported by the extensive retention of WGD-generated duplicates of CytoR signaling components compared with the average retention rate of just 3-4% (73) and is consistent with other studies indicating that WGDs played a crucial role in adaptive immunity by providing new genetic materials for a range of essential components (99). Additional evidence for immunity as a key driver can be gleaned from the significant divergence in the IFN-responsive CytoRs between teleosts and tetrapods (51), likely as a result of the powerful selective forces associated with combatting everchanging pathogens, particularly viruses, which develop subversion mechanisms to counter the antiviral effects of IFNs in fish and mammals (53,80,100). This is borne out, for example, by other data showing that the majority of type I IFNs have been subjected to purifying selection (101).…”
Section: Consequences and Driversmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The diversification also appears to reflect some lineage-specific environmental adaptations. For example, the divergence in IFNRs likely reflects the different pathogen spectrum and dynamics between water-dwelling teleosts and largely land-dwelling tetrapods (80). The role for the somatolactin receptor in body color regulation (81) and PRLR in osmoregulation (70) within teleosts also falls into this category.…”
Section: Diversification Of the Pathwaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to favour their own replication, most viruses have evolved mechanisms to counteract the host's immune response (Feng et al, 2014b;Hoffmann et al, 2015;Taylor & Mossman, 2013). Previous studies have shown that enteroviruses such as the coxsackie B viruses (CVBs) block type I IFN production (Feng et al, 2014a;Mukherjee et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together with IRF9, homodimers or heterodimers of phosphorylated STAT1 and STAT2 form the ISGF3 complex, which translocates into the nucleus, binds to specific IFN-stimulated response elements (ISREs) present in the promoters of IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs) and activates their transcription (Schneider et al, 2014). Viruses have evolved various IFN antagonists to counteract IFN induction and signalling at all steps (Randall & Goodbourn, 2008;Hoffmann et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%