2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.it.2019.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interferon Control of Neurotropic Viral Infections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recovery from infection requires non-cytolytic clearance of the virus from the CNS to avoid further damage to tissue ( Griffin and Metcalf, 2011 ). B cell production of antiviral antibodies ( Bartlett and Griffin, 2020 ), T cell production of IFN-γ ( Milora and Rall, 2019 ), and other immune responses within the infected nervous system are important for non-cytolytic clearance of infectious virus and viral RNA and also for prevention of viral reactivation and recrudescence ( Manglani and McGavern, 2018 ). Microglia and other neural cells exert direct antiviral effects by producing type I interferons that consequently induce autocrine and paracrine expression of IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs), resulting in viral control and hardening of neural cell susceptibility to further infection ( Chen et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Central Nervous System-specific Consequences Of Viral Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recovery from infection requires non-cytolytic clearance of the virus from the CNS to avoid further damage to tissue ( Griffin and Metcalf, 2011 ). B cell production of antiviral antibodies ( Bartlett and Griffin, 2020 ), T cell production of IFN-γ ( Milora and Rall, 2019 ), and other immune responses within the infected nervous system are important for non-cytolytic clearance of infectious virus and viral RNA and also for prevention of viral reactivation and recrudescence ( Manglani and McGavern, 2018 ). Microglia and other neural cells exert direct antiviral effects by producing type I interferons that consequently induce autocrine and paracrine expression of IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs), resulting in viral control and hardening of neural cell susceptibility to further infection ( Chen et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Central Nervous System-specific Consequences Of Viral Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, not all cell types are equally susceptible to viral infection, with differential CNS cell types adopting distinct antiviral strategies to defend against viral infection within its own microenvironment, which defines the outcome of the viral infection. In this context, although glial cells are major type I IFN producers and responders due to their stronger expression of STAT and ISG repertoires, astrocytes tend to adopt a more responsive role with microglial cells being more productive, and potentially acting as an alarming signal for adaptive immunity, driving major anti-inflammatory roles during viral infection ( 111 ). In contrast, neurons may respond differentially to type I IFN based on their maturity state or brain region they are located in, which may define their ISG repertoire and the relative alterations in ISGs expression in response to IFNs; with further work in the field required to fully understand the role of autophagy induction in preference to ISG upregulation to inhibit viral spread and minimize further damage to non-renewable neurons.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2022, local transmission of JEV was detected in Australia for the first time since 1995 and ultimately led to dozens of reported JEV cases within Australia(43). In North America, responses(49)(50)(51)(52). The pathogenic mechanisms of neuroinvasive flaviviruses have been studied extensively in mice, which recapitulate key features of human disease such as neuronal infection, immune infiltration into the CNS, paralysis, encephalitis, and cognitive loss.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%