1995
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a059216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interferon-alpha does not improve the antineoplastic efficacy of high-dose infusional 5-fluorouracil plus folinic acid in advanced colorectal cancer

Abstract: This interim analysis allows the conclusion that infusional 5-FU plus FA/IFN is no more active than infusional 5-FU plus FA alone. However, 5-FU/FA/IFN despite 5-FU dose reduction was associated with unacceptably high toxicity, including 10% deaths. Therefore, further investigation of this regimen is not justified. The study is continued with the comparison of 5-FU/FA vs. 5-FU/IFN.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results could be confirmed by other reports [14,15]. Due to its very mild toxicity, this intravenous regimen is well tolerated.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Similar results could be confirmed by other reports [14,15]. Due to its very mild toxicity, this intravenous regimen is well tolerated.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The response rate seen with 5-FU-IFN-β is consistent with results from the only published study to use 5-FU with IFN-β in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced colorectal cancer (35%; Wadler et al, 1995) and from randomized studies of 5-FU with IFN-α that used the same 5-FU schedule (Corfu-A Study Group, 1995;Hill et al, 1995;Dufour et al, 1996;Greco et al, 1996;Jäger et al, 1996): these studies reported response rates between 21% and 30%. Randomized trials of 5-FU with leucovorin, using different 5-FU schedules, reported similar rates (18-39%; Piedbois et al, 1992;Corfu-A Study Group, 1995;Köhne et al, 1995;Leichman et al, 1995;Jäger et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…A recently published study failed to demonstrate a difference in survival for weekly HD-FU compared with the Mayo Clinic regimen [9, 10]. Although the difference in PFS between the HD-FU and the LV5FU2 arms was not statistically significant at 4.9 and 5.4 months, respectively, these better results were obtained with less toxicity than in the HD-FU arm: grade 3–4 neutropenia was observed in 11% of the patients in the HD-FU arm versus 3 and 4% in the LV5FU2 and ldLV5FU2 arms, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In France, the so-called ‘de Gramont’ schedule combining bolus and 48-hour infusional 5FU has resulted in better response rates and progression-free survival (PFS) compared with bolus 5FU alone [8]. A large randomised EORTC (European Organisation of Research and Therapy against Cancer) trial recently showed that high-dose 5FU given as a weekly 24-hour infusion was better tolerated than bolus 5FU + leucovorin (LV) without any major advantage in terms of efficacy [9, 10]. This regimen has totally replaced bolus 5FU in routine practice in Germany.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%