1999
DOI: 10.1109/26.752825
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interference suppression for DS/CDMA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
17
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it has been widely reported that typically 2 or 3 stages of cancellation is adequate to achieve performance close to the best possible performance, and that increasing the number of stages beyond improves the performance only marginally, while increasing the complexity and delay [ 18]. Accordingly, we next analyze the performance of only the 3rd stage which takes .the 2nd stage soft outputs, Z <k 2 l (i) in ,m ( 16), as its input.…”
Section: Z~(i)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, it has been widely reported that typically 2 or 3 stages of cancellation is adequate to achieve performance close to the best possible performance, and that increasing the number of stages beyond improves the performance only marginally, while increasing the complexity and delay [ 18]. Accordingly, we next analyze the performance of only the 3rd stage which takes .the 2nd stage soft outputs, Z <k 2 l (i) in ,m ( 16), as its input.…”
Section: Z~(i)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The statistics of the interference and noise terms at the 2nd stage output is of interest. Equation (16) can be written as (21) where…”
Section: Z~(i)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, these techniques also require subspace estimation, eigen decomposition, and inversion computation of the covariance matrix, which leads to high computational complexity, and are thereby limited to the applications where fast DOA estimation is not required [13,14]. Furthermore, in the presence of interference, these techniques need to estimate the DOAs of all the target signals and interference, which also increases computational complexity and decreases the accuracy of DOA estimation [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, because of the satellite signal Doppler frequency shift effect, it needs to overcome the filtering impact by Doppler frequency offset. For resolving the two problems, the PD(Partial Dispreading) method [5] is introduced. Figure 2 gives the Schematic of MIRR method based on partial dispreading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%