2020
DOI: 10.1186/s41235-020-0207-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interference scores have inadequate concurrent and convergent validity: Should we stop using the flanker, Simon, and spatial Stroop tasks?

Abstract: Background: Two-hundred one college undergraduates completed four nonverbal interference tasks (Simon, spatial Stroop, vertical Stroop, and flanker) and trait scales of self-control and impulsivity. Regression analyses tested 11 predictors of the composite interference scores derived from three of the four tasks and each task separately. The purpose of the study was to examine the relationships between laboratory measures of self-control, self-report measures, and the degree to which control might be related t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
58
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 140 publications
(128 reference statements)
7
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that this is a set of 25 correlations and these bivariate correlations were not corrected for multiple tests, one might argue that there is very little evidence that self-control scales and laboratory measures of EF are measuring the same construct. This is consistent with the results and conclusions of Paap et al (2020a), Toplak et al (2013), and Duckworth and Kern (2011).…”
Section: Correlations Between Self-rated and Performance-based Measursupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Given that this is a set of 25 correlations and these bivariate correlations were not corrected for multiple tests, one might argue that there is very little evidence that self-control scales and laboratory measures of EF are measuring the same construct. This is consistent with the results and conclusions of Paap et al (2020a), Toplak et al (2013), and Duckworth and Kern (2011).…”
Section: Correlations Between Self-rated and Performance-based Measursupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The development and decline of inhibitory control and monitoring followed the same trajectory in both monolingual and multilingual speakers. However, although the Simon test is widely employed as a measure of inhibition, we also acknowledge that reported correlations of performance across tests designed to measure inhibition are frequently low, and that this observation has led authors to question the convergent validity of the term, and therefore its usefulness in the literature (e.g., Paap et al, 2020; Rey-Mermet et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Many other cognitive tasks that use difference scores to measure a specific cognitive component also produce robust effects at the group level, but fail to show reliability as a measure of individual differences. For example, the commonly used difference scores reflecting the ability to resist interference in the Stroop and flanker tasks, show low reliability ( Paap & Sawi, 2016 ; Paap, Anders-Jefferson, Zimiga, Mason, & Mikulinsky, 2020 ; Siegrist, 1997 ; Von Bastian et al, 2016 ). These measures are also only weakly correlated with each other ( Prior et al, 2017 ; Rey-Mermet, Gade, & Oberauer, 2018 ; Rouder & Haaf, 2019 ) even though they are thought to rely on similar processes ( Draheim et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%