2009 Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) 2009
DOI: 10.1109/wacv.2009.5403036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interference reflection separation from a single image

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compare our method with Kayabol et al's method [9] and Chung et al's method [10]. These two methods also realize the separation of a single superimposed image automatically.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We compare our method with Kayabol et al's method [9] and Chung et al's method [10]. These two methods also realize the separation of a single superimposed image automatically.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As compared with the most related previous work of [10], the proposed algorithm can obtain greatly improved performance by adopting two effective approaches. Firstly, we adopt GPS (gradient profile sharpness) [11] to represent edge smoothness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Remove reflection from a single image is a highly difficult problem compared with multiple image reflection removal since trying to obtain two images (reflection image and a transmission (background) image) from just a single superimposed image is a hard problem but practical scenario and a small number of aspirant methods try to solve it [9]. Some existing works are used sparse gradient priors (a sparsity prior stated that the output of any derivative filter tends to be sparse where the histogram of the output of a derivative filter is peaked at zero and fall off rapidly out to the two extreme ends of the histogram) to classify the reflection and transmission edges as in [10,11] that depend on user intervention to mark the reflection and transmission layer, authors in [12] utilized values of gradient in direct manner, where separated images are reconstructed from the classified gradients that based on the smoothness constraint in the classification of gradients in the superimposed image, as well in [13] that based on the gradient prior to separate the two layers by imposing a sparse gradient prior in the transmission layer and a smooth gradient prior on the reflection layer, the work of [14] is tried to exploit ghosting artifacts that are typical of images captured through a window, to separate the layers the GMM (Gaussian Mixture Model) for regularization is used in the proposed algorithm. Other methods used (Depth Of Field) DOF map to classify edges to reflection and background as in [1].…”
Section: Single Image Reflection Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%