1994
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.49.2247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interference radiative phenomena in the production of heavy unstable particles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
205
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(224 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
11
205
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that (mm2) is not a double-counting of the Coulomb-exchange diagram in Figure 9, since the two diagrams refer to different loop momentum regions. It is well known that for the process e − e + → W − W + → f 1f2 f 3f4 the soft-photon corrections related to the final state cancel for the inclusive cross section [42,43]. The diagrams of type (im) in Figure 10 cancel pairwise when the sum over incoming positrons and electrons is performed.…”
Section: Soft-photon Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that (mm2) is not a double-counting of the Coulomb-exchange diagram in Figure 9, since the two diagrams refer to different loop momentum regions. It is well known that for the process e − e + → W − W + → f 1f2 f 3f4 the soft-photon corrections related to the final state cancel for the inclusive cross section [42,43]. The diagrams of type (im) in Figure 10 cancel pairwise when the sum over incoming positrons and electrons is performed.…”
Section: Soft-photon Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though there is an effective theory framework available for systematically taking into account these corrections [42], a full explicit calculation of electroweak effects at NNLO is still lacking. If we are interested in the total cross section only, the situation is somewhat simpler, since the non-factorizable corrections cancel [43], and the replacement E → E + iΓ t becomes correct with NLO accuracy. Furthermore, some of the electroweak corrections have be taken into account by including them in the matching coefficients [44].…”
Section: The Case Of the Top Quarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(7), are to be evaluated as indicated in Eqs. (42) and (43). Using the threshold expansion [11], the Fourier transform of the leading order Green function can be computed as the sum of all ladder diagrams with the exchange of potential gluons between the heavy quarks and can be written as…”
Section: Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, comparison between purely hadronic decays W + W − → q 1q2 + q 3q4 and semileptonic decays W + W − → q 1q2 + ℓν with the same kinematics could be a sensitive probe of the confinement dynamics. However, the current consensus is that large interference effects are unlikely to be generated during the perturbative phase [2,3,4] of parton shower development that follows immediately on the electroweak decays of the W ± , but the question remains open whether significant interference effects might appear during the subsequent non-perturbative hadronization phase [5,6,7,8,9,10]. These might result either from effects on the parton-tohadron conversion process -due to the fact that the decay products of the W ± overlap in space and time, hadronic clusters might be formed by coalescence of partons from the W + and W − showers, a possibility we term exogamy -or from the statistics of final-state hadrons -most importantly Bose-Einstein correlations among pions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%