2016
DOI: 10.1109/lsp.2015.2504954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interference-plus-Noise Covariance Matrix Reconstruction via Spatial Power Spectrum Sampling for Robust Adaptive Beamforming

Abstract: Recently, a robust adaptive beamforming (RAB) technique based on interference-plus-noise covariance (INC) matrix reconstruction has been proposed, which utilizes the Capon spectrum estimator integrated over a region separated from the direction of the desired signal. Inspired by the sampling and reconstruction idea, in this paper, a novel method named spatial power spectrum sampling (SPSS) is proposed to reconstruct the INC matrix more efficiently, with the corresponding beamforming algorithm developed, where … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
81
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One approach is to estimate the interference-plus-noise matrix using prior knowledge such as array calibration and the angular sector where the desired signal is located [8,9]. The other one is to estimate the steering vector of the desired signal, with the eigenspace-based beamformer being a representative example, applicable to the arbitrary steering vector mismatch case [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One approach is to estimate the interference-plus-noise matrix using prior knowledge such as array calibration and the angular sector where the desired signal is located [8,9]. The other one is to estimate the steering vector of the desired signal, with the eigenspace-based beamformer being a representative example, applicable to the arbitrary steering vector mismatch case [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(18), (19), and (20). Ifâ S = a S , (18), (19), and (20) are strictly true and (22) is reliable. If there exists error betweenâ S and a S , the following iterative method will reduce this error step by step so as to make (22) reliable.…”
Section: Always Holds Lemma 1 Is Obvious and It Is Easy To Be Provementioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, the class of diagonal loading technology [9,10] augment the data covariance with a constant improves the robustness; the worst-case performance optimizationbased beamformer (WCB) [11,12] restrains the gain in signal uncertainty range that is larger than one; the covariance fitting-based beamformer [13,14] solves a new steering vector which is fitting for the sample covariance matrix to avoid desired signal cancellation; the magnitude response constraints method [15,16] improves the robustness by restraining the main beam pattern; the covariance matrix reconstruction approach [17,18] eliminates the signal component from the data covariance matrix to prevent desired signal cancellation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because the microphone spacing is generally greater than the voice signal wavelength, with the classic adaptive beamformer based on GSC, like the Griffiths-Jim beamformer [9] and some others, slight direction estimation error will cancel part of the desired signal [10]. Many signal processing techniques, which are called robust adaptive beamforming, have been proposed to avoid the cancellation of the desired signal [11][12][13][14][15], because their performance is robust against errors. However, the problems of using GSC algorithm are not so serious while processing SLF signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%