2021
DOI: 10.3390/ijms222111450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interference on Cytosolic DNA Activation Attenuates Sepsis Severity: Experiments on Cyclic GMP–AMP Synthase (cGAS) Deficient Mice

Abstract: Although the enhanced responses against serum cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in cases of sepsis—a life-threatening organ dysfunction due to systemic infection—are understood, the influence of the cytosolic DNA receptor cGAS (cyclic guanosine monophosphate–adenosine monophosphate (GMP–AMP) synthase) on sepsis is still unclear. Here, experiments on cGAS deficient (cGAS-/-) mice were conducted using cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) injection sepsis models and macrophages. Severity of CLP in c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(104 reference statements)
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The co-existence of LPS and bacterial DNA in the serum of sepsis mice (CLP and LPS models) may enhance systemic inflammation through macrophage M1 polarization (iNOS and IL-1β expression) [34,35] and NFκB upregulation. Indeed, in macrophages with DNA stimulation alone, there was less potent pro-inflammatory activation (low supernatant IL-10) with TLR-4 upregulation [75], while LPS + DNA exhibited a profound inflammatory response (Figure 9). Notably, the similar downregulation of TLR-4, perhaps from the TLR-4 internalization (endocytosis) [53] between LPS and LPS + DNA activation suggests that bacteria-free DNA did not activate TLR-4, despite a possible DNA-induced TLR-4 activation in some situations [39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The co-existence of LPS and bacterial DNA in the serum of sepsis mice (CLP and LPS models) may enhance systemic inflammation through macrophage M1 polarization (iNOS and IL-1β expression) [34,35] and NFκB upregulation. Indeed, in macrophages with DNA stimulation alone, there was less potent pro-inflammatory activation (low supernatant IL-10) with TLR-4 upregulation [75], while LPS + DNA exhibited a profound inflammatory response (Figure 9). Notably, the similar downregulation of TLR-4, perhaps from the TLR-4 internalization (endocytosis) [53] between LPS and LPS + DNA activation suggests that bacteria-free DNA did not activate TLR-4, despite a possible DNA-induced TLR-4 activation in some situations [39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test the impact of bacterial DNA on sepsis mice, bacterial DNA was administered with and without LPS in mice. Accordingly, DNA was extracted from Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) following a published protocol [75]. Briefly, E. coli in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth isolated DNA using the Tissue Genomic DNA Extraction Mini Kit (Favorgen Biotech, Wembley, WA, Australia) and quantified by a Nanodrop ND-100 (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).…”
Section: Cecal Ligation and Puncture Model And Lipopolysaccharide Wit...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the loss of microbial control due to asplenia is extensively mentioned, studies on the possible impact of LPS tolerance (due to chronic endotoxemia post-splenectomy) on organismal control by macrophages [63,64] are still less. As such, LPS tolerance of macrophages induced lower cytokines, upregulated anti-inflammatory genes (Arginase-1 and TGF-β), downregulated pro-inflammatory genes (iNOS and IL-1β), and reduced cell energy status (both mitochondria and glycolysis) when compared with the single LPS stimulation [65][66][67]. With proteomic analysis, LPS tolerance reduced enzymes for glycolysis energy production, a major energy source for macrophage cytokine production [68], as indicated by decreased phosphofructokinase (a rate-limiting enzyme of glycolysis), which was compensated by enhanced glucose utilization by increased hexokinase [69].…”
Section: Lps Tolerance Macrophage Possibly Enhanced Bacteremia In Dex...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the importance of macrophages in recognizing pathogen molecules [ 50 , 51 ], bone marrow-derived cells were used in the experiments. As such, IS alone (≥2 mM) or with LPS (or BG) reduced macrophage viability, and the combination between IS with LPS or BG did not reduce the toxic concentration of IS ( Figure 6 A).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%