2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.11.160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interference of p53:Twist1 interaction through competing nanobodies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our work confirms that in vitro selection of nanobodies performed imposing stringent parameters represents a valuable modality to isolate binders specific for particular domains, such as antigen epitopes and Ab paratopes [ 34 , 35 ]. We obtained a large and structurally highly heterogeneous array of clones with specificity for a specific idiotype.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Our work confirms that in vitro selection of nanobodies performed imposing stringent parameters represents a valuable modality to isolate binders specific for particular domains, such as antigen epitopes and Ab paratopes [ 34 , 35 ]. We obtained a large and structurally highly heterogeneous array of clones with specificity for a specific idiotype.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The same principle could be applied in the future for the selection of nanobodies specific for EV sub-populations characterized by the presence of exclusive biomarkers. In this perspective, we already demonstrated the possibility to isolate nanobodies from a phage display pre-immune library panning directly on EVs or on specific epitopes of soluble antigens [ 8 , 37 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a nanobody was recently reported to inhibit the interaction between Twist1 and p53 [ 26 ]. Twist1 facilitates the degradation of p53 by the negative regulator murine double minute 2-Protein (MDM2), which in wild-type cancer inhibits the transcriptional activity of p53 and induces its degradation.…”
Section: Intrabodies Against Cytoplasmic or Nucleus Located Taasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can be selected by phage display or ribosomal display from immune, naïve or synthetic single domain antibody repertoires [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ] and inactivate their targets by altering their conformation or interfere with the binding of the target protein to its corresponding binding partner. sdAbs were isolated against intracellular TAAs [ 19 ], including the recent examples of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) [ 24 ], serine/threonine protein kinase AKT2 [ 25 ], p53 C-terminal region involved in the interaction with Twist1 [ 26 ] and chemokine receptor US28 [ 27 ]. In addition to targeting intracellular TAAs, intrabodies have been selected against intracellular neoantigens, for example against HRASG12V [ 28 , 29 , 30 ] HRASG12V, KRASG12D, KRASG13D, NRASQ61R, KRASG12V, KRASQ61H [ 31 ] H - and K - Ras G12V [ 32 ], p21Ras [ 33 ] and KRASG12V [ 34 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%