2000
DOI: 10.2307/749885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interference of Instrumental Instruction in Subsequent Relational Learning

Abstract: To balance their professional obligation to teach for understanding against administrators' push for higher standardized test scores, mathematics teachers sometimes adopt a 2-track strategy: teach part of the time for meaning (relational learning) and part of the time for recall and procedural-skill development (instrumental learning). We explore a possible negative effect of this dual approach when relational learning is preceded by instrumental learning. A group of students who received only relational instr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0
6

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
38
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Pesek and Kirshner (2000) conducted an experimental study of two groups (approximately 50 grade 5 students in each group), where one group was taught instrumental knowledge before relational knowledge (formulas were given and trained, without providing explanations of why they worked), while the other group was taught only relational knowledge (together with the "instrumental" group). The results from pre-, post-, and retention tests, along with student interviews, showed that the "relation" group performed better than the "instrumental" group on items involving both conceptual and procedural tasks.…”
Section: The Conceptual-procedural Distinction In Mathematics Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pesek and Kirshner (2000) conducted an experimental study of two groups (approximately 50 grade 5 students in each group), where one group was taught instrumental knowledge before relational knowledge (formulas were given and trained, without providing explanations of why they worked), while the other group was taught only relational knowledge (together with the "instrumental" group). The results from pre-, post-, and retention tests, along with student interviews, showed that the "relation" group performed better than the "instrumental" group on items involving both conceptual and procedural tasks.…”
Section: The Conceptual-procedural Distinction In Mathematics Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Task-based approaches that help children unpack the key statistical concepts at hand can be considered indicative of higher levels of knowledge of content and teaching, since such approaches engage children in constructing their own knowledge through problem-solving. Children who are given opportunities to do so often have higher levels of achievement than those who do not (Boaler 1998;Carpenter, Fennema, Peterson, Chiang, and Loef 1989;Pesek and Kirshner 2000). …”
Section: Types Of Individualized Support Suggested For Studentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study examined each of these areas. Adult Indeed, prior research has found that learning procedures prior to development of conceptual understanding interferes with this development (Pesek & Kirshner, 2000).…”
Section: Advancing a Research Agenda In Community College Mathematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%