2007
DOI: 10.1109/vetecf.2007.174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interference Analysis of 802.11b and 802.11g Wireless Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The similarities between the investigation in this paper and the one in [7] are such that the same model, see Fig 4, and assumptions 1 can be used. However, its noise power (P noise_ss ) and probability of error (P e ) expressions need to be modified.…”
Section: Interference Analysismentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The similarities between the investigation in this paper and the one in [7] are such that the same model, see Fig 4, and assumptions 1 can be used. However, its noise power (P noise_ss ) and probability of error (P e ) expressions need to be modified.…”
Section: Interference Analysismentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Finally, the P e expression derived in [7], which for this particular case will be denoted by P e_gb , is replaced by …”
Section: B Modifications For 80211g Interferencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The author have used protocol and physical models for interference. Kawade et al [15,16] have compared the performance of IEEE 802.11g and 802.11b radios under co-channel interference by considering the physical layer characteristics. The authors have concluded that IEEE 802.11g networks are more resistant to co-channel interference while channel separation improves the performance of both types of networks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%