1987
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9797(87)90173-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interfacial tension of oil—brine systems in the presence of surfactant and cosurfactant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interfacial tensions for the decane/SDS/aqueous sodium chloride solution are taken from the measurements of Ruckenstein and Rao. 66 Interfacial tensions for decane/aqueous SDS-sodium chloride were measured by Rehfeld. 67 The surface tensions of aqueous SDS solutions at varying sodium chloride concentration were estimated from the parameterisation (eqn ( 17)) provided by Prissle et al 55 It should be noted that the values used implicitly include the salting out of the surfactant by sodium chloride, both for the surface and interfacial tension values.…”
Section: Probing Mixed Phase Aerosol Droplets With Optical Tweezersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interfacial tensions for the decane/SDS/aqueous sodium chloride solution are taken from the measurements of Ruckenstein and Rao. 66 Interfacial tensions for decane/aqueous SDS-sodium chloride were measured by Rehfeld. 67 The surface tensions of aqueous SDS solutions at varying sodium chloride concentration were estimated from the parameterisation (eqn ( 17)) provided by Prissle et al 55 It should be noted that the values used implicitly include the salting out of the surfactant by sodium chloride, both for the surface and interfacial tension values.…”
Section: Probing Mixed Phase Aerosol Droplets With Optical Tweezersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the effect of some surfactants on the interfacial 38 properties of shale oil systems has been investigated in the past, the limited data available in the litera-39 ture were mainly obtained at ambient conditions and thus may not be representative of fluid-rock inter- 40 actions at actual reservoir conditions. 41 In this study, a new framework is proposed to investigate the effect of surfactants on fundamental 42 parameters governing fluid displacement in two brine/oil/shale systems (A and B) at reservoir conditions. 43 The critical micelle concentration (CMC) of anionic and nonionic surfactants in brine and their adsorption 44 propensity on shale was first determined by ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy and pendant drop method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the salinity further decreasing, the IFTs of the studied systems increased again. It is believed that this interesting response of IFTs to salinity was mainly caused by the dissolved hydrocarbons (polar species entering the water phase) in the water phase, and subsequently made the ions at the interface insufficient to present the LSE as claimed by Moeini et al 44,45 A schematic representation of this process is shown in Figure 4, which can assist in understanding the complex mechanisms involved in this process. Unfortu- nately, it is challenging to accurately determine this partitioning to the interface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%