2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.supflu.2010.08.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interfacial tension and the behavior of microemulsions and macroemulsions of water and carbon dioxide with a branched hydrocarbon nonionic surfactant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
55
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
4
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1 displays two CO 2 -philic tails on molecular backbone, which are a propylene oxide (PO) oligomer and a moderately branched hydrocarbon. The dual tails of surfactant EH-3 decrease A TT and increase the surfactant absorption at the water-CO 2 interface more effectively than TMN-3 consisting of one tail, leading to a sufficiently low value of c down to about 1 mN/m [26]. Similar results were obtained by varying the surfactant concentration from (1 to 5) wt.% at given pressures.…”
Section: Surfactant Effects On the Removal Ratesupporting
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1 displays two CO 2 -philic tails on molecular backbone, which are a propylene oxide (PO) oligomer and a moderately branched hydrocarbon. The dual tails of surfactant EH-3 decrease A TT and increase the surfactant absorption at the water-CO 2 interface more effectively than TMN-3 consisting of one tail, leading to a sufficiently low value of c down to about 1 mN/m [26]. Similar results were obtained by varying the surfactant concentration from (1 to 5) wt.% at given pressures.…”
Section: Surfactant Effects On the Removal Ratesupporting
confidence: 69%
“…As seen from the tabulated values, the W S increased with the addition of surfactant in scCO 2 and the enhancement induced by EH-3 is obviously greater than that by TMN-3 at the same operating conditions (W S ¼ 5:01 for EH-3 and W S ¼ 4:06 for TMN-3 at 25 MPa, respectively). This is attributed to the stubby surfactant tails favoring the formation of a stable W/CO 2 microemulsion and subsequent lowering the interfacial tension c. The stubby tails on the EH-3 and TMN-3 backbone weaken the interactions between tails (reducing A TT ), which will raise the solubility of EH-3 and TMN-3 in scCO 2 and the adsorption of surfactants at the water-CO 2 interface by enhancing the solvation of surfactant tails with CO 2 [26,32]. The stubby tails may also be expected to inhibit the interpenetration due to steric repulsion upon approach of two microemulsion droplets and lead to weaker inter-droplet interactions, which are unusually strong in the weak solvent CO 2 , thereby reducing the chance for phase separation [25].…”
Section: Surfactant Effects On the Removal Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[15] In this study temperature measurements were extended to 120 °C. Gibbs adsorption equation (Equation 2) was used below the CMC to determine the molar surface density of the surfactant monolayer.…”
Section: Interfacial Tension Measurements At the Co2-brine Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sanders et al (2010) reported the design and synthesis of a new class of twin-tailed surfactants based on glycerin and designed for the scCO 2 -water interface, whose performance was better than a linear secondary alcohol CO 2 -soluble surfactant. Adkins et al (2010a, b) and Chen et al (2010) have proven that a branched hydrocarbon nonionic surfactant can effectively reduce the contact of CO 2 and water phases and raise the surface pressure and the surfactant efficiency (the concentration to produce 20 mN/m interfacial tension reductions). Chen et al (2012) developed a switchable ethoxylated cationic CO 2 -philic surfactant which was able to stabilize CO 2 /water foams up to 182 g/L at 120°C, 3400 psia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%