1996
DOI: 10.1006/jmrb.1996.0148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interfacial Spin–Spin Coupling in Wood by 2D Time-Domain NMR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result of exchange, which partially mixes magnetizations from different polymer regions on a timescale of hundreds of milliseconds, only the apparent values of T 1 and fraction magnitudes are observed. 46,47 The fact that at least two components are observed at all temperatures, in contrast to previous reports, 11,12 is likely due to extensive annealing of this sample, resulting in more effective separation between different regions in the sample.…”
Section: Present Resultscontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…As a result of exchange, which partially mixes magnetizations from different polymer regions on a timescale of hundreds of milliseconds, only the apparent values of T 1 and fraction magnitudes are observed. 46,47 The fact that at least two components are observed at all temperatures, in contrast to previous reports, 11,12 is likely due to extensive annealing of this sample, resulting in more effective separation between different regions in the sample.…”
Section: Present Resultscontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…(0), with the T 2 values and normalized magnetization fractions, obtained from the fit, given in Table. It may be noted that the T 2 values obtained from the present fit of the Gaussian damped sinc function or sinc-Gaussian function (∼ 20 µs) (Eq. (0)) are longer than those observed for the Gaussian fit for biological dry matrices (∼ 14 µs) [8].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The experimental parameters, and model apparent parameters calculated from Eq. (3) for certain trial intrinsic values of these parameters are compared within an iterative minimization algorithm, giving the intrinsic relaxation parameters ((1/T 1,int ) i [j] and k ij ), which represent the best match between these two sets of parameters [8]. We found the exchange rate k starch−water = 86 s −1 , and spin-lattice relaxation time T 1starch = 172 ms for the major 82.2% component, and T 1water = 49 ms for the minor 17.8% component magnetization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We obtained T ex = 8.1 ms which was in the same order as previous measurements for water in aspen wood (16 ms) [48], in poly [2-hydroxyethyl-methacrylaye] (21.1 ms) [12], in polyelectrolyte multilayers (24.6 ms) [37] and in filter paper (44 ms) [4].…”
Section: Goldman-shen Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 92%