1977
DOI: 10.1002/pen.760170711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interfacial (polymer‐substrate) failure of ultraviolet radiation curable coatings

Abstract: The development of ultraviolet radiation technology to cure or photopolymerize acrylic unsaturated monomers, oligomers, and polymers into tight network structures introduces several adhesion problems that can be related to or associated with interfacial polymer‐substrate failure. This paper discusses network formation, polymer‐interfacial growth association and failure as a function of the following variables: light intensity (effect on sol/gel conversion), photoinitiator (structurereactivity as a function of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

1982
1982
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Rate coefficients for reactions , , and were calculated in aqueous phase using both the M06‐2X/6‐311++G (3df, 2p)//B3LYP/6‐31+G (d, p) and M06‐2X/6‐311++G (3df, 2p)//CAM‐B3LYP/6‐31+G (d, p) schemes to evaluate the ability of the B3LYP and CAM‐B3LYP functionals to reproduce the chemistry of the SO 4 • — radical anion. Table shows overall rate coefficients calculated using both schemes along with experimental constants and the error between experimental and calculated free energy barriers of reactions |ΔGexpΔGcalc|. Gibbs free energy barriers, reaction path degeneracies, and tunneling correction factors are shown in Tables S9–S16 in the Supporting Information for both s‐cis and s‐trans conformers of each monomer in reactions , , and .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rate coefficients for reactions , , and were calculated in aqueous phase using both the M06‐2X/6‐311++G (3df, 2p)//B3LYP/6‐31+G (d, p) and M06‐2X/6‐311++G (3df, 2p)//CAM‐B3LYP/6‐31+G (d, p) schemes to evaluate the ability of the B3LYP and CAM‐B3LYP functionals to reproduce the chemistry of the SO 4 • — radical anion. Table shows overall rate coefficients calculated using both schemes along with experimental constants and the error between experimental and calculated free energy barriers of reactions |ΔGexpΔGcalc|. Gibbs free energy barriers, reaction path degeneracies, and tunneling correction factors are shown in Tables S9–S16 in the Supporting Information for both s‐cis and s‐trans conformers of each monomer in reactions , , and .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because SO 4 •- radicals are very reactive toward vinyl groups, blank experiments consider the reaction of sulfate radicals with VA and 4-VP in the absence of silica NP. The rate constant for reaction (R6) for VA, k 6VA = (1.5 ± 1.0) × 10 9 M -1 s -1 , is reported in the literature. , However, no information has been found for the rate constant of the reaction between sulfate radicals and 4-VP, despite the fact that this reaction has been extensively used for initiating the polymerization of 4-VA. ,,, We will therefore first describe experiments designed to measure this rate constant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the reactions of the highly electrophilic sulfate radical with MMA and VAc as shown in Fig. 3, addition McGinniss and Kah reported that the reaction rate constant of the sulfate radical with MMA (1.26·10 9 L·mol -1 ·s -1 ) was slightly lower than with VAc (1.52·10 9 L·mol -1 ·s -1 ) [14,15]. However, it should be noted that these are not the addition rate constants of the sulfate radical to the monomers but the constants of decay of the sulfate radical in presence of the monomers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%