2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.micron.2017.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interfacial microstructure and mechanical properties of Cf/AZ91D composites with TiO2 and PyC fiber coatings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 2-(2-Chloro-5-nitrophenyl)pyridine is the key intermediate for the synthesis of vismodegib, which is converted into 4-chloro-3-(pyridin-2-yl)aniline via a reduction reaction, which is then reacted with commercially available 2-chloro-4-methylsulfonylbenzoic acid to afford vismodegib (Scheme 1). [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Seven representative synthetic routes to 2-(2-chloro-5-nitrophenyl)pyridine have been reported in the literature. The main difference between these routes are the construction of the phenyl pyridine, for which there were two described methods: a coupling reaction catalyzed by a metal catalyst, such as in routes A-D, [5][6][7][8] and a cyclization reaction utilizing appropriate functional groups on the substituted benzene, such as in routes E-G. [9][10][11] Catalysts containing palladium are employed to synthesize the key intermediate in routes A-E, which increases the complexity of purification due to the low limits of palladium residue in drugs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3 2-(2-Chloro-5-nitrophenyl)pyridine is the key intermediate for the synthesis of vismodegib, which is converted into 4-chloro-3-(pyridin-2-yl)aniline via a reduction reaction, which is then reacted with commercially available 2-chloro-4-methylsulfonylbenzoic acid to afford vismodegib (Scheme 1). [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Seven representative synthetic routes to 2-(2-chloro-5-nitrophenyl)pyridine have been reported in the literature. The main difference between these routes are the construction of the phenyl pyridine, for which there were two described methods: a coupling reaction catalyzed by a metal catalyst, such as in routes A-D, [5][6][7][8] and a cyclization reaction utilizing appropriate functional groups on the substituted benzene, such as in routes E-G. [9][10][11] Catalysts containing palladium are employed to synthesize the key intermediate in routes A-E, which increases the complexity of purification due to the low limits of palladium residue in drugs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Seven representative synthetic routes to 2-(2-chloro-5-nitrophenyl)pyridine have been reported in the literature. The main difference between these routes are the construction of the phenyl pyridine, for which there were two described methods: a coupling reaction catalyzed by a metal catalyst, such as in routes A-D, [5][6][7][8] and a cyclization reaction utilizing appropriate functional groups on the substituted benzene, such as in routes E-G. [9][10][11] Catalysts containing palladium are employed to synthesize the key intermediate in routes A-E, which increases the complexity of purification due to the low limits of palladium residue in drugs. In addition, the use of precious metals will increase the synthetic costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…squeeze casting or stir casting, are faced with important issues related to the matrix/reinforcement interface. On one hand, for C fibre MgMCs, the poor wettability between carbon and pure Mg [4][5][6] may result in inadequate distribution of the reinforcing phase in the metallic matrix [2,7]. On the other hand, excessive interfacial reactions between the reinforcement and the molten metal may prove detrimental to the integrity and mechanical behaviour of the composite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These poor mechanical properties are due to a significant degradation of the reinforcement and/or to the formation of brittle intermetallic compounds. In particular, extensive undesirable reactions have been reported between carbon and Mg alloys with a high Al content (such as alloy AZ91D) in the liquid-state and for high processing temperature [4,6,8]. Poor interface bonding may lead to premature failure by matrix decohesion from the C fibre [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%