2011
DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/23/2/025705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interfacial magnetic coupling between Fe nanoparticles in Fe–Ag granular alloys

Abstract: The role of the interface in mediating interparticle magnetic interactions has been analysed in Fe50Ag50 and Fe55Ag45 granular thin films deposited by the pulsed laser deposition technique (PLD). These samples are composed of crystalline bcc Fe (2–4 nm) nanoparticles and fcc Ag (10–12 nm) nanoparticles, separated by an amorphous Fe50Ag50 interface, occupying around 20% of the sample volume, as determined by x-ray diffraction (XRD), x-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS), and high resolution transmission electron … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach previously used for a variety of systems [28,[34][35][36][37][38] does not fit our experimental data At T = 300 K, the Fe 15 Ag 85 (see top panel Figure 5) signal is very close to the structural one, being different in the region 0.015 ≤ Q ≤ 0.2Å −1 (highlighted in the top panel of Figure 6), which corresponds to the lengthscale 3.1 ≤ D ≤ 42 nm. This implies some short-range correlations among clusters of Fe nanoparticles (approximately between 2 and 15 closed packed Fe nanoparticles, bearing in mind that the size of a single MNP is around 2.7 nm), even in the most dilute case, at high temperatures and in absence of field, as was suggested in previous studies [4,8,10]. Cooling down to 150 K produces an increase of the magnetic signal in the whole Q-range, specially in the 0.01 ≤ Q ≤ 0.2Å −1 (3.1 ≤ D ≤ 63 nm, clusters spanning 2 to 23 Fe nanoparticles) region.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This approach previously used for a variety of systems [28,[34][35][36][37][38] does not fit our experimental data At T = 300 K, the Fe 15 Ag 85 (see top panel Figure 5) signal is very close to the structural one, being different in the region 0.015 ≤ Q ≤ 0.2Å −1 (highlighted in the top panel of Figure 6), which corresponds to the lengthscale 3.1 ≤ D ≤ 42 nm. This implies some short-range correlations among clusters of Fe nanoparticles (approximately between 2 and 15 closed packed Fe nanoparticles, bearing in mind that the size of a single MNP is around 2.7 nm), even in the most dilute case, at high temperatures and in absence of field, as was suggested in previous studies [4,8,10]. Cooling down to 150 K produces an increase of the magnetic signal in the whole Q-range, specially in the 0.01 ≤ Q ≤ 0.2Å −1 (3.1 ≤ D ≤ 63 nm, clusters spanning 2 to 23 Fe nanoparticles) region.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Therefore the system is said in a blocked state when the acquisition time of the experimental technique is lower than the characteristic time or in the superparamagnetic (SPM) state when the acquisition time is greater than the characteristic time. Conversely when the interparticle interactions are very strong all of the nanoparticles could spontaneously align in a superferromagnetic (SFM) state [4][5][6][7][8]. In between these two extremes the superspin glass (SSG) state is found.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It must be finally underlined that the effect described here is purely related to the measurements conditions, since all the investigated temperatures lie below the Curie temperature of our PBA. Nevertheless, it is interesting to remember that, for compounds with temperature-dependent ordered magnetic states, XMCD measurements at different temperatures can also bring valuable information on the different states and on the transition between them (Chaboy et al, 1998;Bartolomé et al, 2005;Laguna-Marco et al, 2009;Carvallo et al, 2010;Boada et al, 2010b;Alonso et al, 2012).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our system, there is significant deviation between T irr and T f , especially for low fields (<10 mT), which indicates that the system is not magnetically homogeneous [ 41 ] although the material is compositionally homogeneous. This may indicate the existence of a magnetic cluster phase [ 42 ] in the sample. The magnetic inhomogeneity could be attributed to the interplay between ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic interactions of Mn, resulting in short range magnetic (FM or AF) ordering.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%