2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2006.07.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interfacial interactions and colloid retention under steady flows in a capillary channel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
60
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
(154 reference statements)
3
60
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Attachment to the air-water interface has been observed for both hydrophobic and hydrophilic colloids with either positive or negative surface charges (24,25,(29)(30)(31)(32), but hydrophobic colloids have been reported to have a greater affinity for the air-water interface than hydrophilic colloids (24,(29)(30)(31)(33)(34)(35). Major forces controlling colloid attachment to the air-water interface include electrostatic, van der Waals, hydrophobic, and capillary interactions (25,27,31,32). As has been observed for solid-water interface attachment, electrostatic interaction has also been found to be significant in air-water interface attachment, especially for hydrophilic colloids (31,36,37).…”
Section: Transport Of Colloids and Nanomaterials In Unsaturated Poroumentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Attachment to the air-water interface has been observed for both hydrophobic and hydrophilic colloids with either positive or negative surface charges (24,25,(29)(30)(31)(32), but hydrophobic colloids have been reported to have a greater affinity for the air-water interface than hydrophilic colloids (24,(29)(30)(31)(33)(34)(35). Major forces controlling colloid attachment to the air-water interface include electrostatic, van der Waals, hydrophobic, and capillary interactions (25,27,31,32). As has been observed for solid-water interface attachment, electrostatic interaction has also been found to be significant in air-water interface attachment, especially for hydrophilic colloids (31,36,37).…”
Section: Transport Of Colloids and Nanomaterials In Unsaturated Poroumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, positively charged colloids usually show greater adsorption to the air-water interface than negatively charged colloids (29,37,40). Hydrophobic interactions between colloids and the air-water interface are believed to be much stronger than DLVO forces (i.e., electrostatic and van der Waals forces), so are able to overcome the energy barrier for the air-water interface attachment, allowing even negatively charged colloids to attach to the air-water interface in some cases (31,32,41,42). As is the case with attachment to the solidwater interface, attachment to the air-water interface also strongly depends on surface properties of colloids (hydrophobicity, zeta potential), solution chemistry (pH, ionic strength), and pore water flow rate.…”
Section: Transport Of Colloids and Nanomaterials In Unsaturated Poroumentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several mechanisms are responsible for colloid transport in unsaturated zone in addition to that of saturated zone, such as, liquid-gas interface capture, solid-liquid-gas interface capture, liquid-film straining, and storage in immobile liquid zones [13,18,27,44,51,68,70,79,85,87]. The strong force (capillary force) associated with the moving liquid-gas interfaces led to particle mobilization in the natural subsurface environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%