2012
DOI: 10.1093/imamat/hxs046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interfacial energies on quasicrystals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the numerical simulations show a surprising agreement with experimental evidence, we feel that a rigorous basis on the homogenization results presented in [2] needs to be firmly established. We expect that Γ-convergence results can be now confidently formulated and conjectured, see [13]. Moreover we expect that the methods exploited in [14] could be adapted to get also a priori error estimates in the replacement process involved when passing from discrete to continuum models.…”
Section: Concluding Remarks and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…While the numerical simulations show a surprising agreement with experimental evidence, we feel that a rigorous basis on the homogenization results presented in [2] needs to be firmly established. We expect that Γ-convergence results can be now confidently formulated and conjectured, see [13]. Moreover we expect that the methods exploited in [14] could be adapted to get also a priori error estimates in the replacement process involved when passing from discrete to continuum models.…”
Section: Concluding Remarks and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…To deal with convergence of sequences u ε : εL → S, we adopt the idea of [15]. We will see in Section 6 that this notion of convergence is indeed meaningful for variational problems in a random environment.…”
Section: Modeling Discrete Disordered Thin Sets and Spin Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We say that L is an admissible set of points if the following two requirements are satisfied: (i) there exists r > 0 such that |x − y| ≥ r for all x = y, x, y ∈ L, (ii) there exists R > 0 such that dist(x, L) ≤ R for all x ∈ R k . Within this definition we may include 'slices' of periodic lattices [3], and also aperiodic geometries [15]. Given a probability space (Ω, F, P), a random variable L : Ω → (R d ) N is called an admissible stochastic lattice if, uniformly with respect to ω ∈ Ω, L(ω) is an admissible set of points.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for general f (and u i taking values in a more general set), showing that the limit is a bulk integral g * * (u) dx (8) (g * * denotes the convex envelope of g). Note however that in the ferromagnetic spin case g is trivial, and can be interpreted as a double-well potential with minima in ±1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%