2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.10.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interfacial-dislocation-controlled deformation and fracture in nanolayered composites: Toward higher ductility of drawn pearlite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, several models and simulations have been performed to explain the dislocation transmission mechanism across the ferrite–cementite interface in pearlitic steels [ 22 , 30 , 122 , 131 , 132 , 133 , 134 ]. However, the direct dislocation transmission across the interface has not been confirmed through experimental observations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, several models and simulations have been performed to explain the dislocation transmission mechanism across the ferrite–cementite interface in pearlitic steels [ 22 , 30 , 122 , 131 , 132 , 133 , 134 ]. However, the direct dislocation transmission across the interface has not been confirmed through experimental observations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is few solid evidence of the dislocation transmission across a ferrite–cementite interface by means of direct transmission, although the slip transfer has been observed in the pearlite. The feasibility of dislocation transmission is researched by using LRB criteria [ 132 , 133 ], dislocation transmission mechanism m′ (mentioned in Section 3.1 ) [ 30 ] and simulation [ 122 , 131 , 134 ]. According to LRB criteria, two {110}<111> slip systems and one {112}<111> slip system of ferrite are possible to transmit across the ferrite–cementite interface.…”
Section: Interactions Between Dislocation and Boundarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 , the initial state, without applied load, does include lattice distortion around the boundaries, which can be attributed to a misfit strain due to thermal stress during cooling in the process. The initial residual stress may assist in a plasticity initiation by dislocation nucleation/multiplication as indicated by Shimokawa et al [54] . This can be a reason for the lower flow stress leading to the lower hardening rate as shown in Figs.…”
Section: Assessment Of Micromechanical Modelmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[11][12][13][14] Furthermore, the interfacial dislocation structure and interfacial energies for each OR have been thoroughly investigated using atomic simulations, [15][16][17] as are the interfacial mediated plastic deformations. [18][19][20][21] There is a strong correlation between the interfacial dislocation density and the phase stress; the former affects the activated plastic deformation mode's critical resolved stress. The latter affects its driving force; hence, the interfacial dislocation density can be a dominant factor in the activated plastic deformation mode.…”
Section: Molecular Dynamics Simulation Of the Effect Of Cementite Dec...mentioning
confidence: 99%