2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1359-835x(02)00089-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interfacial bond strength and fracture energy at room and elevated temperature in titanium matrix composites (SCS-6/Timetal 834)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
20
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3a represent an ideal Kelly-Tyson distribution. This profile is consistent with the observations of other studies for SCS-6 fibres in Ti matrices [13,17,39], indicating that stress transfer is occurring by the mechanism of frictional sliding. The interfacial shear stress at the fibre matrix interface can be deduced from the gradient in axial fibre strain de f /dz:…”
Section: Scs-6 Coated Fibre Systemsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3a represent an ideal Kelly-Tyson distribution. This profile is consistent with the observations of other studies for SCS-6 fibres in Ti matrices [13,17,39], indicating that stress transfer is occurring by the mechanism of frictional sliding. The interfacial shear stress at the fibre matrix interface can be deduced from the gradient in axial fibre strain de f /dz:…”
Section: Scs-6 Coated Fibre Systemsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Push-out [13], transverse tensioned push-out [14] and full fragmentation [11,15,16] testing have been applied previously to measure interface strength. All rely on micromechanics models and simplifying assumptions (e.g., constant radial clamping stresses along the fibre length) in order to back-out the interface properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…shear strength) of the Cu/W multi-layer interface (429 MPa) is slightly higher than that of the Cu single-layer interface (393 MPa). These d values suggest a moderate shear strength compared to a carbon-coated glass fiber-reinforced cement composite (50 MPa) [10] or a SiC fiber-reinforced titanium composite (500 MPa) [11].…”
Section: Calibration Of Interfacial Parametersmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The same procedure is followed to determine the frictional shear stresses making use of the minimum load after debonding. A real material property can be deduced if the non-homogeneous (shear) stress distribution along the fibre is considered either with the aid of analytical or finite element analyses [10][11][12].…”
Section: Characterization Of the Interface By Push-out Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%