1990
DOI: 10.1016/0255-2701(90)87004-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interfacial area and gas-side mass transfer coefficient of a gas—liquid absorption column: pilot-scale comparison of various tray types

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the Scheffe system, 11 the results calculated by our model showed obvious positive deviations. By contrast, the Azrak 12 and Peytavy 13 systems showed negative deviations. The experimental valve of Scheffe 11 is Glistch V-1, and its structure is similar to that of the Glistch V-4 valve, which was used in Brahem's experiment.…”
Section: Validation Of the Extended New Interfacial Area Modelmentioning
confidence: 50%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For the Scheffe system, 11 the results calculated by our model showed obvious positive deviations. By contrast, the Azrak 12 and Peytavy 13 systems showed negative deviations. The experimental valve of Scheffe 11 is Glistch V-1, and its structure is similar to that of the Glistch V-4 valve, which was used in Brahem's experiment.…”
Section: Validation Of the Extended New Interfacial Area Modelmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…In Liang's system, 14 foaming can be ignored because the system is air-water. However, moderate or heavy foaming would occur in the systems of Azrak 12 and Peytavy 13 because DEA can decrease the water surface tension. Once the foam becomes established, the mean bubble size will decrease, whereas the gas holdups will increase.…”
Section: Data For Model Development and Testingmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations