2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113760
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interfacial and mechanical properties of continuous ramie fiber reinforced biocomposites fabricated by in-situ impregnated 3D printing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this figure, it was found that the layer thickness had the most important effect on the dynamic strength of printed CRFRC from a holistic point of view, followed by hatch spacing and strain rate.Specifically, printing parameters in this study such as layer thickness and hatch spacing could affect the microstructural characteristics such as fiber content and void content as discussed in Sections 3.1 and 3.2. It was well known that fiber content and void content have important influences on the mechanical properties of the 3Dprinted continuous fiber reinforced composites [11,38,47]. Comparing the results in Figure4with those in Figures5 and 7, it could be found that higher fiber content corresponded to higher dynamic strength whereas higher void content corresponded to lower dynamic strength.…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this figure, it was found that the layer thickness had the most important effect on the dynamic strength of printed CRFRC from a holistic point of view, followed by hatch spacing and strain rate.Specifically, printing parameters in this study such as layer thickness and hatch spacing could affect the microstructural characteristics such as fiber content and void content as discussed in Sections 3.1 and 3.2. It was well known that fiber content and void content have important influences on the mechanical properties of the 3Dprinted continuous fiber reinforced composites [11,38,47]. Comparing the results in Figure4with those in Figures5 and 7, it could be found that higher fiber content corresponded to higher dynamic strength whereas higher void content corresponded to lower dynamic strength.…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…It was well known that fiber content and void content have important influences on the mechanical properties of the 3Dprinted continuous fiber reinforced composites. [11,38,47] Comparing the results in Figure 4 with those in Figures 5 and 7, it could be found that higher fiber content corresponded to higher dynamic strength whereas higher void content corresponded to lower dynamic strength. When the load was applied to the CRFRC, the load could be transferred to the continuous fiber from the matrix through shear behavior.…”
Section: Prediction Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A series of studies have focused on the FDM 3D printing of natural fiber/PLA composites. The natural fibers involved include wood [ 4 , 5 ], flax [ 6 , 7 ], kenaf [ 8 ], ramie [ 9 ], jute [ 10 ], sugarcane bagasse [ 11 ], bamboo [ 12 ], rice straw [ 13 ], rice husk [ 4 ], energy grass [ 14 ], and so on. For FDM 3D printed natural fiber/PLA composite, its properties are decided to a great extent by the printing processes/parameters, thus the effect of the printing processes/parameters on the performance of FDM 3D printed specimen is currently being investigated by many researchers to promote the wider development of FDM [ 5 , 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3D printed continuous fiber reinforced composites (CFRC) have attracted increasing attention in recent years 16–19 . It was proved that 3D printed composites reinforced by continuous fibers showed much higher mechanical properties than those reinforced by short fibers in previous studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,15 3D printed continuous fiber reinforced composites (CFRC) have attracted increasing attention in recent years. [16][17][18][19] It was proved that 3D printed composites reinforced by continuous fibers showed much higher mechanical properties than those reinforced by short fibers in previous studies. However, the bonding between deposited lines and between layers was still considered a weakness in 3D printed composites though composites were reinforced by continuous fibers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%