2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interface Reduction for CMS Methods and Alternative Model Order Reduction

Abstract: In many cases, complex dynamical systems consist of separable components. In order to be able to stick to a setup with exchangeable modules, the description of the interface or port that is used for the connection is very important. Classic reduction approaches in substructuring, such as the well-know Craig-Bampton procedure, typically use brute-force methods for the interface description. It is shown that instead of maintaining local ansatz functions for each node at the interface, a semi-global approach can … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the CMS approach this is realized by utilizing an eigenmode expansion [6,18,19,26], which has recently been combined with input-output-based model reduction in [20]. In [11] Eftang and Patera develop an empirical pairwise training procedure for port reduction within the scRBE context: Modes are selected from traces of snapshots generated by random boundary conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the CMS approach this is realized by utilizing an eigenmode expansion [6,18,19,26], which has recently been combined with input-output-based model reduction in [20]. In [11] Eftang and Patera develop an empirical pairwise training procedure for port reduction within the scRBE context: Modes are selected from traces of snapshots generated by random boundary conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, this local-level technique causes a considerable compromise in accuracy. Holzwarth et al [35] aimed to improve the accuracy of local-level CC modes computation by adopting the Legendre polynomials. However, accuracy compromising and synthesis cumbersome remain critical concerns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using their approach, the modes used at every interface depend only on the adjacent substructures and can be quickly updated if substructures are added, removed, or changed. Holzwarth et al [11] recently demonstrated the use of Legendre Polynomials as basis functions for local interface reduction and compared the performance to S-CC interface reduction. The work by Balmès [3] explored a CMS basis that defined arbitrary interface deformations to describe a set of generalized DOF along an interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%