Interface properties of aluminum/steel friction-welded components

Yılmaz, Muharrem; Çöl, Mustafa; Acet, Mehmet

doi:10.1016/s1044-5803(03)00051-2

Cited by 172 publications

(85 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The increasing in the thickness of IMC with slightly increased average peak temperature of about 50 K is still unclear. Since the FeAl 3 phase is a hard and brittle intermetallic compound, 13,14) it appears that the thick intermetallic compound of FeAl 3 decreased the shear load of the joint. Fig.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Lap Joint of A5083 Aluminum Alloy and SS400 Steel by Friction Stir Welding

2005

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A lap joint of A5083 aluminum alloy and SS400 steel was produced by Friction Stir Welding (FSW) using the various process parameters such as rotational speed, traverse speed and pin depth. The variations of welding parameters produced various characteristic interfaces and had conspicuous influences on the joint properties. Increasing the rotational speed decreased the shear load of the joint due to producing a thick FeAl 3 intermetallic compound (IMC) at the interface. When traverse speed increased, the shear load increased because IMC thickness at the interface decreased, however, when the speed was so high, an incomplete interface was formed. Increasing the pin depth produced a thick FeAl 3 IMC phase and an incomplete interface that directly deteriorated the shear load of the joint.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Lap Joint of A5083 Aluminum Alloy and SS400 Steel by Friction Stir Welding

2005

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Due to metallurgical changes in weld interface, phase changes in delta ferrite formations, grain boundary corrosion and sigma phase will arise. For avoiding this, pre-and postheat treatment are needed to prevent the metallurgical defects [3][4][5][6][7]. Moreover, joining of austenitic stainless steel under cryogenic or corrosive environment, the ferrite quantity to be minimized or controlled to avoid property degradation during service.…”

Section: Problems In Fusion Welding On Stainless Steelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Friction Welding of Austenitic Stainless Steel with Copper Material

Chinnakannan¹

2017

Austenitic Stainless Steels - New Aspects

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Austenitic stainless steels are most preferred over other types of stainless steel families. Welding of stainless steel using friction welding is widely seen in the current scenario. Since the time consumed for friction welding is very less, metallurgical defects are almost reduced without pre-and postheat treatment. The problems encountered in friction welding during joining of austenitic stainless steel are very limited when compared to fusion welding process. The studies have undergone with joining of austenitic stainless steel and copper material to evaluate the friction welding parameter for finding the good bond strength.

show abstract

“…The intermetallic compound layer thickness was 4.80 μm. Yilmaz [11] reported that the tensile strength was highly influenced by the intermetallic compound layer thickness in the reaction zone. Increase in layer thickness leads to weaken the tensile strength.…”

Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Analysis of Microstructure and Mechanical Properties on Friction Stir Welded Joint of Dissimilar 304 Stainless Steel and Commercially Pure Aluminium

Balamagendiravarman

Kundu

Chatterjee

2017

Archives of Metallurgy and Materials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this study, friction stir welding of dissimilar 304 stainless steel and commercially pure aluminium was performed under the following condition of tool rotational speed 1000 rpm, traverse speed 60 mm/min and tool tilt angle 2 degree. Microstructural characterisation was carried out by optical microscope, scanning electron microscope (SEM). Optical images shows that the microstructural change is very minimum in steel side when compared to aluminium side due to the difference in mechanical and thermal properties. The intermetallic compound Al3Fe was observed at the interfacial region and stir region of the welded joint. The maximum ultimate tensile strength is 78% of commercially pure aluminium base metal. Microhardness profile was measured across the weld interface and the maximum value reaches at the stir zone due to the formation of intermettalics.

show abstract

Interface properties of aluminum/steel friction-welded components

Cited by 172 publications

References 4 publications

Lap Joint of A5083 Aluminum Alloy and SS400 Steel by Friction Stir Welding

Lap Joint of A5083 Aluminum Alloy and SS400 Steel by Friction Stir Welding

Friction Welding of Austenitic Stainless Steel with Copper Material

An Analysis of Microstructure and Mechanical Properties on Friction Stir Welded Joint of Dissimilar 304 Stainless Steel and Commercially Pure Aluminium

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About