2019
DOI: 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interface Processes and Anomalous Oxygen Transport in Rapid Metal Oxidation and Magnetite Formation at Protoplanetary Conditions

Abstract: It has long become evident that the stability and abundance of water across the solar protoplanetary disk was affected by extensive gradients of temperature and oxygen fugacity, but it is unclear to which extent water was directly involved in gas−solid interactions with minerals. In order to better understand the chemical and mineralogical record of water in the early stages of the solar system, I have studied the reaction of metallic Fe 94 Ni 5 Co 1 Cr 1 an analog to common minerals in the protoplanetary dis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EDX analysis was performed in scanning TEM (STEM) mode aided by high-angle annular dark-field (HAADF) imaging. Quantitative elemental abundances within the whisker metal were calculated using the Cliff-Lorimer thin film approximation with k-factors determined from an artificial Fe-Ni-Co-Cr alloy of known composition 67 . High-resolution elemental profiles (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EDX analysis was performed in scanning TEM (STEM) mode aided by high-angle annular dark-field (HAADF) imaging. Quantitative elemental abundances within the whisker metal were calculated using the Cliff-Lorimer thin film approximation with k-factors determined from an artificial Fe-Ni-Co-Cr alloy of known composition 67 . High-resolution elemental profiles (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, morphologies of iron metals are different between iron sulfides and magnetite. The self-diffusion coefficient of iron in magnetite 30 is several orders of magnitudes lower than in iron sulfides 31 through a wide range of temperature and oxygen fugacity. Iron nano-particles on magnetite may nucleate from excess iron atoms in the vicinity, while iron whiskers may be derived from excess iron atoms that diffuse long distance to the limited nucleation sites on iron sulfides, perhaps via accelerated surface and/or grain boundary diffusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The self-diffusion coefficient of iron in magnetite 25 is several orders of magnitudes lower than in iron sulfides 26 through a wide range of temperatures and oxygen fugacities. Iron nanoparticles on magnetite may have nucleated from excess iron atoms in the vicinity, whereas iron whiskers may be derived from excess iron atoms that diffused long distances to the limited nucleation sites on iron sulfides, perhaps through accelerated surface or grain boundary diffusion.…”
Section: Formation Of Metallic Iron and Selective Escape Of Volatilesmentioning
confidence: 94%