2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2005.09.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interface material failure modeled by the extended finite-element method and level sets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moës et al (2003) first proposed the use of X-FEM for the homegenization of periodic basic cells in two-phase composites. Since then, the combined X-FEM/levelset approach has been extended to model interfacial failure in composites (see Hettich and Ramm, 2006;Hettich et al, 2008), for obtaining homogenized properties for heterogeneous structures (see Legrain et al, 2011), and for obtaining effective elastic modulii in nanocomposites (Yvonnet et al, 2008). For geo-mechanical problems, X-FEM has been employed to model faulting (see the work of Borja, 2009, 2010a), earthquake ruptures (Coon et al, 2011) and subsurface flow (Huang et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moës et al (2003) first proposed the use of X-FEM for the homegenization of periodic basic cells in two-phase composites. Since then, the combined X-FEM/levelset approach has been extended to model interfacial failure in composites (see Hettich and Ramm, 2006;Hettich et al, 2008), for obtaining homogenized properties for heterogeneous structures (see Legrain et al, 2011), and for obtaining effective elastic modulii in nanocomposites (Yvonnet et al, 2008). For geo-mechanical problems, X-FEM has been employed to model faulting (see the work of Borja, 2009, 2010a), earthquake ruptures (Coon et al, 2011) and subsurface flow (Huang et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now, if changes slightly from * , e.g. = * + with >0, then the source term becomes negative due to the second condition in Equation (12), so that it tends to bring back to * , and the same occurs if <0. This condition is analogous for the roots * = ± ref of Equation (10).…”
Section: Reinitialization Of the Ls Functionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The Heaviside function is typically a discontinuous function used to describe the crack surface discontinuity. The methods for determining H (x) usually include: (1) scalar product method noted by Moës et al [10], (2) triangular orientation method noted by Sukumar and Prévost [13], and (3) level set method noted by Belytschko et al [26], Stolarska et al [27], Sukumar et al [28], Nagashima et al [29], and Hettich et al [19,20]. Generally, these methods are mainly focused on the smooth crack geometry, and not well suited for non-smooth crack geometry such as crack kinking.…”
Section: Determination Of the Discontinuous Enrichment Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%