2016
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201600736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interface‐Engineered All‐Solid‐State Li‐Ion Batteries Based on Garnet‐Type Fast Li+ Conductors

Abstract: with solid electrolytes. [ 3 ] Solid electrolytes offer many advantages and could enable the use of new high capacity electrode materials such as sulfur, [ 4 ] manganese, [5][6][7] and vanadate [ 8,9 ] -based cathodes which may not be stable and safe in the current Li-ion battery technology based on liquid electrolytes. [ 10 ] Furthermore, solid electrolytes have the promise to use directly metallic lithium anodes, i.e., preventing dendritic lithium growth, which enables even higher energy densities. From a pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
196
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 287 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
8
196
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 12 depicts the cross-sectional SEM images and Nyquist plots of classic electrode-electrolyte and porous electrolyte interfaces. [118] Figure 12a illustrates the classic electrode-electrolyte interface with an obvious dividing line that is similar to what we mentioned above, while the composite electrode in Figure 12b intimately embeds in the porous electrolyte surface with no clear boundary. Comparison of impedance results in Figure 12c demonstrates the lower cathode-solid electrolyte interface resistance of the surfaceengineered sample, indicating the promising availability of interface-engineered methods in SSLSB and SSLAB designs.…”
Section: Wwwadvenergymatdementioning
confidence: 57%
“…Figure 12 depicts the cross-sectional SEM images and Nyquist plots of classic electrode-electrolyte and porous electrolyte interfaces. [118] Figure 12a illustrates the classic electrode-electrolyte interface with an obvious dividing line that is similar to what we mentioned above, while the composite electrode in Figure 12b intimately embeds in the porous electrolyte surface with no clear boundary. Comparison of impedance results in Figure 12c demonstrates the lower cathode-solid electrolyte interface resistance of the surfaceengineered sample, indicating the promising availability of interface-engineered methods in SSLSB and SSLAB designs.…”
Section: Wwwadvenergymatdementioning
confidence: 57%
“…Recently, an interface-engineered all–solid-state battery was developed to adopt a porous garnet electrolyte structure to enhance Li-ion transfer at the electrode-electrolyte interface with improved capacities and cycling performance ( 51 ). We envision that garnet structure with interface engineering can be designed into interconnected ion and electron networks for Li-S and Li-O 2 batteries to host dissolved sulfur/polysulfides or active catalysts with high surface areas.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The all-solidstate ceramic batteries with garnet electrolyte usually have larger internal resistances and only work at small current densities; for example, one interface-engineered all-solidstate ceramic battery based on garnet electrolyte has a large resistance of 10 000 W and has a capacity of 20 Ah kg À1 at a current of 2 A kg À1 at 95 8C. [14] To demonstrate further the advantages of the LiF modification that decreases the interfacial resistance, Li-S cells with a LLZT and a LLZT-2LiF solid electrolyte were assembled. The solid electrolyte can efficiently block the polysulfide shuttle, which is a severe problem in Li-S batteries.…”
Section: à2mentioning
confidence: 99%