2016
DOI: 10.1557/jmr.2016.43
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interface characteristics and mechanical behavior of metal inert-gas arc welded Mg–steel joints

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum mild tensile strength of the joint could reach 144 MPa. Wang et al [ 195–198 ] studied the effects of heat input and Al content in the weld on the mechanical properties of Q235 low‐carbon steel and AZ31B Mg alloy‐welded joints. Experiments have found that the welding heat input and the Al content of the weld have a significant effect on the strength of the steel/Mg joint.…”
Section: Brazingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum mild tensile strength of the joint could reach 144 MPa. Wang et al [ 195–198 ] studied the effects of heat input and Al content in the weld on the mechanical properties of Q235 low‐carbon steel and AZ31B Mg alloy‐welded joints. Experiments have found that the welding heat input and the Al content of the weld have a significant effect on the strength of the steel/Mg joint.…”
Section: Brazingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The notable approaches are the application of interlayer, cover plate, low heat input, combination of welding and mechanical joining, and appropriate alloying of filler metals. Table 2 presents some of the attempts taken by different researchers to enhance the performance of dissimilar metal welds of steel-aluminum , aluminum-magnesium [63][64][65][66][67][68][69] , and steel-magnesium [70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79] . In terms of present infrastructures in automotive industries, manufacturing cost, and weld quality the application of the least amount of heat input and appropriate filler metal alloys were identified as the most significant approaches.…”
Section: Dissimilar Materials Welding Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 4 shows the schematic diagram of the four Nguyen et al 40) Shah et al 41) Zhang et al 63) Wang et al 70) Liu et al 71) Tungsten inert gas (TIG) welding Borrisutthekul et al 42) Song et al 43) Liu et al 64) Wang et al 72) Resistance spot welding (RSW) Pouranvari et al 44) Qui et al 45) Satonaka et al 46) Winnicki et al 47) Baskoro et al 48) Su et al 49) Ibrahim et al 50) Oikawa et al 51) Sun et al 52) Zhang et al 65) Sun et al 66) Min et al 73) Feng et al 74) Laser welding Torkamany et al 53) Dharmendra et al 54) Chang et al 67) Liu et al 64) Li et al 75) Cold metal transfer (CMT) Jácome et al 55) Kang et al 56) Shang et al 68) Ren et al 76) Friction stir welding (FSW) Watanabe et al 57) Morishige et al 69) Chang et al 67) Czerwinski et al 77) Element welding Meschut et al 58) Qui et al 59) Ling et al 60) Ling et al 61) Meschut et al 58) Absar et al 62) Manladan et al 78) Manladan et al 79)…”
Section: Steel-aluminum Weldingunclassified
“…The effect of Al content in Mg alloy filler wire on the microstructure and mechanical properties of the joint was also investigated. Figure 16g shows the Mg/steel joint, whose tensile strength could reach 184.2 MPa with the AZ31 filler metal added; its reaction layer was composed of FeAl IMC [54]. Joint strength could reach 192 MPa (80% AZ31 Mg alloy) with the AZ61 filler metal added [55].…”
Section: Welding-brazingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MIG welding process [53,54,55] ( a ) schematic diagram for Cu interlayer added; ( b ) cross-section of joint with 0.1 mm Cu; ( c – f ) microstructure of weld seam, eutectic structure, interfacial microstructure and reaction layer close to steel in ( b ), respectively; ( g ) interfacial microstructure for AZ31 filler wire added; ( h ) Mg/steel interface TEM image near in ( g ); ( i ) interfacial microstructure for AZ31 filler wire added.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%