2004
DOI: 10.1002/pse.187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interface bond between FRP sheets and concrete substrates: properties, numerical modeling and roles in member behaviour

Abstract: SUMMARYThe success of most of strengthening or retrofitting technologies for concrete structures by using external bonded FRP sheets highly depends on the interface bond between FRP sheets and concrete substrates. This paper reviews current studies on evaluating the bond properties of FRP sheet-concrete interfaces, and in particular, focuses on several newly developed bond models for describing the bond characteristics of FRP sheet-concrete interfaces under various loading conditions. This paper also gives sev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
1
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
29
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For the bonded FRP sheets, the bond stresses developed within a certain length known as the effective bond length 22) . The previous studies 23), 24) have reported that the increase in the stiffness of the sheets resulted in the greater effective bond length. When the debonding of the sheets initiated, the effective bond length shifted to the nearby inactive bond zone until the debonding progressed completely 9), 25) .…”
Section: C) Prestressing Levelmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…For the bonded FRP sheets, the bond stresses developed within a certain length known as the effective bond length 22) . The previous studies 23), 24) have reported that the increase in the stiffness of the sheets resulted in the greater effective bond length. When the debonding of the sheets initiated, the effective bond length shifted to the nearby inactive bond zone until the debonding progressed completely 9), 25) .…”
Section: C) Prestressing Levelmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…1 (a) and Fig. 1(d), are the most commonly used test methods among researchers because of their simplicity [4,[37][38][39][40][41][42]. However, the state of stress in the concrete in each of these two test methods can be expected to be quite different.…”
Section: Testing Methods and Configurations For Concrete Substratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lifting of bonded sheet can simulate the interface defects that can be induced during bonding construction is classified as spalling defect [13]. When spalling takes place definite shear crack appears in flexural structures, the spalling part and the unspalling part lie in different curved surfaces [14].…”
Section: Spallingmentioning
confidence: 99%