Interface between Periodontal Tissues and Dental Materials: Dynamic Changes and Challenges

Isola, Gaetano

doi:10.3390/coatings11050485

Cited by 4 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As an initial requirement for clinical success, the appearance of a healthy periodontium is critical to all conservative, endodontic, and prosthetic therapies. Periodontology and restorative dentistry interact in several clinical areas, including the interface between the position of the restoration margins, the contours of the dental crown, and the subsequent response of the gingival tissues to conservative and prosthetic restorations [ 15 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Restoring black triangle with bioclear matrix versus conventional celluloid matrix method: a randomized clinical trial

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Open gingival embrasures form complex aesthetic and functional problems. This clinical trial assessed the bioclear matrix using injection molding technique against conventional celluloid matrix technique in management of black triangle. Methods A total of 26 participants were randomly divided into two groups (13 participants each) according to the technique used. In group (A) celluloid conventional matrix method was used, while in group (B) bioclear matrix with injection molding technique was used. The different outcomes (Esthetic evaluation, marginal integrity and patient satisfaction) were evaluated following the FDI criteria by two blinded examiners. The evaluation was done at (T0) (immediate after restoration); (T6) after 6 months; and (T12) after 12 months. Statistical analysis was done as categorical and ordinal data were presented as frequency and percentage values. Categorical data were compared using fisher’s exact test. Intergroup comparisons for ordinal data were analyzed utilizing the Mann–Whitney U test, while intragroup comparisons were analyzed using Friedman’s test followed by the Nemenyi post hoc test. The significance level was set at p ≤ 0.05 within all tests. Results Regarding radiographic marginal integrity and marginal adaptation, the bioclear matrix group revealed superior results when compared to celluloid matrix group with a significant difference between both groups at all intervals (p < 0.05); however no significant difference was detected at different intervals. While for proximal anatomical form and esthetic anatomical form, as well as phonetics and food impaction, all cases in both groups were successful with no statistical significant difference between groups. For the periodontal response, there was no significant difference between groups. However, there was a significant difference between scores measured at different intervals, with T0 being significantly different from other intervals (p < 0.001). Marginal staining revealed that there was no significant difference between groups. While, a significant difference between scores measured at different intervals. Conclusions The restorative management of the black triangle with both protocols was able to deliver superior aesthetic and good marginal adaptation; suitable biological properties; with adequate survival time. Both techniques were almost equally successful, however they are depending on the operator skills. Trial registration The clinical trial was registered in the (www.clinicaltrials.gov/) database in 23/07/2020; with the unique identification number NCT04482790.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Restoring black triangle with bioclear matrix versus conventional celluloid matrix method: a randomized clinical trial

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Figure 4 summarizes the search results from this study regarding OOAC for dentistry that have been developed and investigated by several research groups. With respect to dentistry, it was found that OOAC has been used to study biofilm and saliva [ 195–211 ], dentin and pulp complex [ 212–216 ], oral mucosa [ 213–220 ], periodontal tissue [ 221–224 ], and oral malignancies [ 225–229 ]. Some other groups developed OOAC to study digestion mechanism [ 230 ], innervation [ 231 ], tooth germs and oral cell differentiation [ 232 ].…”

Section: Overview Of Organ-on-a-chipmentioning

confidence: 99%

“… To this date, the OOAC was used to study biofilm and saliva [ 187–211 ], dentin and pulp complex [ 212–216 ], oral mucosa [ 213–220 ], periodontal tissue [ 221–224 , 233 ], and oral malignancies [ 225–229 ]. Some other groups developed OOAC to study digestion mechanism [ 230 ], innervation [ 231 ], tooth germs and oral cell differentiation [ 212 , 232 ].…”

Section: Overview Of Organ-on-a-chipmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These components are different in some respects, such as location, biological composition, chemical composition, and tissue architecture, but all these components are integrated [ 233 ]. The integrity of these components represents the key success to all conservative, endodontic, and prosthetic therapies and becomes initial requirement for clinical success evaluation [ 221 ].…”

Section: Overview Of Organ-on-a-chipmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Microfluidic Organ-On-A-Chip: Into the Next Decade of Bone Tissue Engineering Applied in Dentistry

Syahruddin,

Anggraeni,

Ana

2023

Future Sci. OA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A comprehensive understanding of the complex physiological and pathological processes associated with alveolar bones, their responses to different therapeutics strategies, and cell interactions with biomaterial becomes necessary in precisely treating patients with severe progressive periodontitis, as a bone-related issue in dentistry. However, existing monolayer cell culture or pre-clinical models have been unable to mimic the complex physiological, pathological and regeneration processes in the bone microenvironment in response to different therapeutic strategies. In this point, ‘organ-on-a-chip’ (OOAC) technology, specifically ‘alveolar-bone-on-a-chip’, is expected to resolve the problems by better imitating infection site microenvironment and microphysiology within the oral tissues. The OOAC technology is assessed in this study toward better approaches in disease modeling and better therapeutics strategy for bone tissue engineering applied in dentistry.

show abstract

“…Fixed restorations are long-term attached to the teeth with a specific dental luting cement that cannot be self-removed by the patient. Fixed prostheses come in contact with the prepared teeth abutments (especially dentin) and, respectively, their surrounding gingiva (marginal periodontium) [47]. In the case of removable partial dentures, the metal-based structure (dental base) comes into contact with the denturesupporting tissues such as the edentulous alveolar ridge and its covering masticatory mucosa and with anatomical elements such as the hard palate and its covering mucosa (the major connector of the partial removable denture) [48].…”

Section: The Oral Cavity Relationship With Prosthodontics and Implant...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Technological Aspects and Performance of High Entropy Alloys with Potential Application in Dental Restorations and Reducing Implant Failure

Demetrescu,

Nartita,

Andrei

et al. 2023

Applied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Amidst the prevalence of aggressive bacterial infections that can impact both oral and systemic health following various dental and implant procedures, the search for alternative, high-performing and biocompatible materials has become a challenging pursuit. The need for such investigations is increasing owing to the fact that toxicological risks of cobalt–chromium (CoCr) alloys used in dentistry have become a part of the EU’s new Medical Devices Regulations establishing that cobalt metal has been classified as carcinogenic, genotoxic and detrimental to reproduction. Within this context, this review proposes high entropy alloys (HEA) as potential alternatives and presents their characteristics and in vitro biological performance when used as a substrate or coating. Anatomical details of the oral cavity in relationship with prosthodontics and implant dentistry support the paper’s motivation and presentation. The review highlights the innovative manufacturing procedures, microstructure and properties of both the bulk and coatings of BioHEA. It evaluates the performance of BioHEAs based on their complete characterization and assesses their suitability for novel applications in dentistry, serving as the primary objective of this manuscript.

show abstract

Interface between Periodontal Tissues and Dental Materials: Dynamic Changes and Challenges

Abstract: Periodontal tissues play an important role in the correct aesthetics, function and comfort of the dentition [...]

Cited by 4 publications

References 24 publications

Restoring black triangle with bioclear matrix versus conventional celluloid matrix method: a randomized clinical trial

Restoring black triangle with bioclear matrix versus conventional celluloid matrix method: a randomized clinical trial

A Microfluidic Organ-On-A-Chip: Into the Next Decade of Bone Tissue Engineering Applied in Dentistry

Technological Aspects and Performance of High Entropy Alloys with Potential Application in Dental Restorations and Reducing Implant Failure

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About