2014
DOI: 10.15517/rbt.v1i2.15273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interethnic variability and admixture in Latin America - social implications

Abstract: Past and present attempts to classify and characterize the human biological variability are examined, considering the race concept, ethnic identification problems, assortative mating based on ethnicity, and historical genetics. In relation to the latter, a review is made of the methods presently available for admixture quantification and of previous studies aimed at the characterization of the parental continental contributions to Latin American populations, with emphasis in global evaluations of the Costa Ric… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…All combinations of bilocal, patrilocal or matrilocal societies were simulated corresponding to a total of nine scenarios (see the electronic supplementary material, table S1), using the mSR parameter. As in Currat & Excoffier [17], we assumed unidirectional admixture, from the HG to the farmer layer, in agreement with anthropological data suggesting that asymmetrical gene flow occurs when a dominant group invades a new region, as is supposed to have happened during the Bantu expansion [33] or in the colonization of Brazil by Europeans [34]. Five values of g (0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75 and 1) were used for each of the nine scenarios above, for a total of 45 different simulation sets carried out in the 10Â10 lattices.…”
Section: (B) Neolithic Transition Modelsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…All combinations of bilocal, patrilocal or matrilocal societies were simulated corresponding to a total of nine scenarios (see the electronic supplementary material, table S1), using the mSR parameter. As in Currat & Excoffier [17], we assumed unidirectional admixture, from the HG to the farmer layer, in agreement with anthropological data suggesting that asymmetrical gene flow occurs when a dominant group invades a new region, as is supposed to have happened during the Bantu expansion [33] or in the colonization of Brazil by Europeans [34]. Five values of g (0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75 and 1) were used for each of the nine scenarios above, for a total of 45 different simulation sets carried out in the 10Â10 lattices.…”
Section: (B) Neolithic Transition Modelsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…This is the case for the Brazilian population that is the result of more than 500 years of social, commercial and physical contact between Europeans, Native Americans and Africans. 1 These peoples met and mated with each other in distinct ways that varied across the continental expanse of the country, giving rise to a multiethnic and highly admixed population. 2 In Brazil, skin color has been used as a phenotypic surrogate for biogeographical ancestry in the scientific literature, but with recognition of the influence of socioeconomics, familial origin and ethnic identity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incluso en grupos étnicos como los han de China, ha sido necesario incluir otras variables predictoras como el gen CYP4F2 (17). La situación se complica en poblaciones muy mezcladas, como la latinoamericana, en la cual la contribución relativa de africanos, amerindios y europeos varía de acuerdo con circunstancias históricas (18). No parece haber, entonces, una única fórmula idónea, por lo que deben considerarse los factores locales a la hora de escoger el algoritmo farmacogenético más apropiado (19).…”
unclassified