Interest of the preliminary risk analysis method in a central sterile supply department

Niel-Lainé, Juliette; Martelli, Nicolas; Bonan, Brigitte; Talon, Damien; Desroches, Alain; Prognon, Patrice; Vincent, Florence

doi:10.1136/bmjqs.2010.048074

Cited by 8 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…According to the results, there were several methods for outlining risky processes that executive levels of HCOs can use depending on their needs: Textual system description, 8,41,53,59 activity breakdown structure (ABS), 8 radar charts, 34 flow charts, 3,25,28,30,38,45,50,56,62 All organizational processes (clinical and non-clinical processes, technology processes, etc.) 8 Customer perceptions, costs, functions and health status 8…”

Section: Risk Identification Describing the Process And System Definimentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Used by resources to perform their activities and all the tools necessary to support processes within a healthcare delivery system. (information system, information security, Technology selection and implementation related) 8,31,34,40,45,60 1-3 Communication/information: As the basis of the relationships among resources and between them and technological supports.…”

Section: Risk Identification Describing the Process And System Definimentioning

confidence: 99%

“…8,31,34,40,55,59 1-4 Human or personnel resource 34,45,55,59 1-5 Financial: Form of financing, evaluation, return. 31,45,59 1-6 Organization conditions or location 45,55 1-7 Customer 43 1-8 Administrative or task 25,55 1-9 Knowledge and skill 40 1-10 Material and equipment: displays/integrity/positioning/ usability diagrams, 34,38,45,56,58 system diagram, 8,34,62 integration definition (IDEF), 35 and hierarchical task analysis Diagram (HTA) or task diagram, 26,28,35,42,57,62 communication diagram, 56,62 information diagram, 35,56,62,63 organizational diagram, 35,56,62,63 stakeholder diagrams, 56 swim lane activity diagram, 56 state transition diagram, 56 sequence diagram,…”

Section: Risk Identification Describing the Process And System Definimentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

<p>Risk Management in Executive Levels of Healthcare Organizations: Insights from a Scoping Review (2018)</p>

Ferdosi

Rezayatmand

Taleghani

2020

RMHP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: This study attempted to present a framework and appropriate techniques for implementing risk management (RM) in executive levels of healthcare organizations (HCOs) and grasping new future research opportunities in this field. Methods: A scoping review was conducted of all English language studies, from January 2000 to October 2018 in the main bibliographic databases. Review selection and characterization were performed by two independent reviewers using pretested forms. Results: Following a keyword search and an assessment of fit for this review, 37 studies were analyzed. Based on the findings and considering the ISO31000 model, a comprehensive yet simple framework of risk management is developed for the executive levels of HCOs. It includes five main phases: establishing the context, risk assessment, risk treatment, monitoring and review, and communication and consultation. A set of tools and techniques were also suggested for use at each phase. Also, the status of risk management in the executive levels of HCOs was determined based on the proposed framework. Conclusion: The framework can be used as a training tool to guide in effective risk assessment as well as a tool to assess non-clinical risks of healthcare organizations. Managers of healthcare organizations who seek to ensure high quality should use a range of risk management methods and tools in their organizations, based on their need, and not assume that each tool is comprehensive.

show abstract

Section: Risk Identification Describing the Process And System Definimentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Risk Identification Describing the Process And System Definimentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Risk Identification Describing the Process And System Definimentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

<p>Risk Management in Executive Levels of Healthcare Organizations: Insights from a Scoping Review (2018)</p>

Ferdosi

Rezayatmand

Taleghani

2020

RMHP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Indeed, the time‐consuming aspect of the method has already been mentioned in previous works (15). However, we had already used other risk analysis methods, such as preliminary risk analysis and hazard analysis and critical control points, both of which were much more time‐consuming than FMECA (20,21).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Use of a risk assessment method to improve the safety of negative pressure wound therapy

Lelong

Martelli

Bonan

et al. 2012

International Wound Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To conduct a risk analysis of the negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) care process and to improve the safety of NPWT, a working group of nurses, hospital pharmacists, physicians and hospital managers performed a risk analysis for the process of NPWT care. The failure modes, effects and criticality analysis (FMECA) method was used for this analysis. Failure modes and their consequences were defined and classified as a function of their criticality to identify priority actions for improvement. By contrast to classical FMECA, the criticality index (CI) of each consequence was calculated by multiplying occurrence, severity and detection scores. We identified 13 failure modes, leading to 20 different consequences. The CI of consequences was initially 712, falling to 357 after corrective measures were implemented. The major improvements proposed included the establishment of 6-monthly training cycles for nurses, physicians and surgeons and the introduction of computerised prescription for NPWT. The FMECA method also made it possible to prioritise actions as a function of the criticality ranking of consequences and was easily understood and used by the working group. This study is, to our knowledge, the first to use the FMECA method to improve the safety of NPWT.

show abstract

“…Definitions related to risk differ from each other as their range (broad or narrow) refers to different contexts, approaches and meanings [30]. These have been created to satisfy the requirements of various groups of interested parties (risk is defined differently by engineers [34], management specialists [31], lawyers, doctors [27] and physicians). Thus, depending on whether the author of the given definition creates it within the framework of a specific scientific discipline or for the needs of specific practical issues, not only is it possible to define risk differently, it is also possible to measure it differently [38].…”

Section: The Risk Of Damage To the Telecommunications Copper Access Nmentioning

confidence: 99%

The use of preliminary hazard analysis to assess the risk of damage to the telecommunications wired access network

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article presents the results of studies relating to the possibility of the practical use of the preliminary hazard analysis method to assess the risk of damage to the telecommunications copper access network. use of the Pha method allows the identification and evaluation of risk factors; it enables the comparison of the risk of damage to components of the telecommunications copper access network located in different geographical areas. This generates the possibility of the effective application of a comparative analysis (including the service quality) by the operator for different network areas. The method also allows the setting of benchmarks for improving the effectiveness of the technical services of the operator.

show abstract

Interest of the preliminary risk analysis method in a central sterile supply department

Abstract: The PRA constitutes an appropriate tool for assessing quality-improvement policy and safety in healthcare facilities that can be easily integrated into standard quality-management systems.

Cited by 8 publications

References 14 publications

<p>Risk Management in Executive Levels of Healthcare Organizations: Insights from a Scoping Review (2018)</p>

<p>Risk Management in Executive Levels of Healthcare Organizations: Insights from a Scoping Review (2018)</p>

Use of a risk assessment method to improve the safety of negative pressure wound therapy

The use of preliminary hazard analysis to assess the risk of damage to the telecommunications wired access network

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About