2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.12.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interest of nailing associated with the Masquelet technique in reconstruction of bone defect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, some surgeons believe infection control should take priority. Thus, based on different concepts treatment protocols mainly include 1) local debridement and antibiotic administration and retaining the nail until after bone union, 2) nail removal, re-reaming, and replacement of a larger diameter intramedullary nail or a resorbable antibiotic coated nail [ 10 , 23 ], and 3) nail removal, segmental bone resection, reaming and irrigation, and bone defect reconstruction with bone transport [ 29 ] or the Masquelet technique [ 30 , 31 ]. We are inclined to a more aggressive treatment protocol, and in our opinion retaining the nail or replacing it with another internal fixation device after debridement is not suitable for infection control, because the residual pathogens and its biofilms might lead a higher potential for infection recurrence and treatment failure [ 6 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, some surgeons believe infection control should take priority. Thus, based on different concepts treatment protocols mainly include 1) local debridement and antibiotic administration and retaining the nail until after bone union, 2) nail removal, re-reaming, and replacement of a larger diameter intramedullary nail or a resorbable antibiotic coated nail [ 10 , 23 ], and 3) nail removal, segmental bone resection, reaming and irrigation, and bone defect reconstruction with bone transport [ 29 ] or the Masquelet technique [ 30 , 31 ]. We are inclined to a more aggressive treatment protocol, and in our opinion retaining the nail or replacing it with another internal fixation device after debridement is not suitable for infection control, because the residual pathogens and its biofilms might lead a higher potential for infection recurrence and treatment failure [ 6 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, some surgeons believe infection control should take priority. Thus, based on different concepts treatment protocols mainly include 1) local debridement and antibiotic administration and retaining the nail until after bone union, 2) nail removal, re-reaming, and replacement of a larger diameter intramedullary nail or a resorbable antibiotic coated nail [12,25], and 3) nail removal, segmental bone resection, reaming and irrigation, and bone defect reconstruction with bone transport [31] or the Masquelet technique [32,33]. We are inclined to a more aggressive treatment protocol, and in our opinion retaining the nail or replacing it with another internal xation device after debridement is not suitable for infection control, because the residual pathogens and its bio lms might lead a higher potential for infection recurrence and treatment failure [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preoperative and post-operative radiographs for each patient are shown in (Fig. 1,2,3,4,5,6). Intraoperative images from patient 2 are shown in (Fig.…”
Section: All Of These Approaches and Combinations Of Techniques Attemptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After stabilization of the patient and once the site of injury is acceptable for definitive skeletal reconstruction and fixation, critical bone loss presents a dilemma in and of itself. No consensus has been approached in terms of management of these bone defects [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%