Interdisciplinary Interventions and Teams Are Good…Can We Move Beyond That?

Resnick, Barbara

doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2013.03.011

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Appelhof et al, 2018;Zwijsen et al, 2014a). Interestingly, Rosemond et al (2012) did not find time to be relevant, nor lack of financial investments or staff training, which are often reported barriers as well (Resnick, 2013). Alternatively, they suggest that the three most important criteria for successful implementation might be confidence of nursing teams in their ability to meet the change goals, their belief that change will contribute to improvement in daily routines, and commitment of management.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Implementing a multidisciplinary psychotropic medication review among nursing home residents with dementia: a process evaluation

Gerritsen

Vries

Smalbrugge

et al. 2019

Int. Psychogeriatr.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives:Before drawing conclusions on the contribution of an effective intervention to daily practice and initiating dissemination, its quality and implementation in daily practice should be optimal. The aim of this process evaluation was to study these aspects alongside a randomized controlled trial investigating the effects of a multidisciplinary biannual medication review in long-term care organizations (NTR3569).Design:Process evaluation with multiple measurements.Setting:Thirteen units for people with dementia in six long-term care organizations in the Netherlands.Participants:Physicians, pharmacists, and nursing staff of participating units.Intervention:The PROPER intervention is a structured and biannually repeated multidisciplinary medication review supported by organizational preparation and education, evaluation, and guidance.Measurements:Web-based questionnaires, interviews, attendance lists of education sessions, medication reviews and evaluation meetings, minutes, evaluation, and registration forms.Results:Participation rates in education sessions (95%), medication reviews (95%), and evaluation meetings (82%) were high. The intervention’s relevance and feasibility and applied implementation strategies were highly rated. However, the education sessions and conversations during medication reviews were too pharmacologically oriented for several nursing staff members. Identified barriers to implementation were required time, investment, planning issues, and high staff turnover; facilitators were the positive attitude of professionals toward the intervention, the support of higher management, and the appointment of a local implementation coordinator.Conclusion:Implementation was successful. The commitment of both higher management and professionals was an important factor. This may partly have been due to the subject being topical; Dutch long-term-care organizations are pressed to lower inappropriate psychotropic drug use.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…Regarding points of concern for the implementation, turnover and understaffing of nursing staff were important organizational barriers. These barriers are commonly reported (Resnick, 2013) and are difficult to influence. Time is also a commonly reported barrier that was present in our study (e.g.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%