2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interdisciplinary integration in Europe: the case of the Fifth Framework programme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
236
1
11

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 270 publications
(269 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
236
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The first category, personal characteristics, includes six conditions. The three conditions curiosity, respect, and openness point at the necessary appreciative attitude towards other disciplines (Bruce et al 2004). Importantly, students appeared to have a wide variation in attitude towards other disciplines (Woods 2007).…”
Section: Exploration Of Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The first category, personal characteristics, includes six conditions. The three conditions curiosity, respect, and openness point at the necessary appreciative attitude towards other disciplines (Bruce et al 2004). Importantly, students appeared to have a wide variation in attitude towards other disciplines (Woods 2007).…”
Section: Exploration Of Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This was a finding of a review 6 of the European Union's efforts to stimulate interdisciplinary work under its Fifth Framework Programme for research development. Projects did not succeed as well as they might have because they did not facilitate 'enabling "The generic protocols of a scientific paper and those for a piece of humanities research are very different.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interdisciplinary work requires particular skills, mindsets and attention to establishing common ground [6][7][8] .…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It requires defining the research questions with a broader context in mind, and some knowledge about the methods and capabilities of other disciplines that could contribute complementary insight. This in turn requires a common vocabulary (Horwitz 2003;Bruce et al 2004;Klein 2008). By interpreting what they observed against the background of their own discipline, Jerneck et al (2011) illustrated the problems by demonstrating that social scientists may misinterpret the term 'uncertainty' in natural science debates as an indicator of scientific disagreements, not as an unavoidable data problem.…”
Section: The Challenge Of Interdisciplinaritymentioning
confidence: 99%