2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11661-012-1248-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interdiffusion in the Mg-Al System and Intrinsic Diffusion in β-Mg2Al3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
66
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
11
66
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(6) with Q % 80 kJ/mol and taking temperatures from 300 to 423 K to allow for processing at room temperature and the temperature rise during HPT processing, the pre-exponential constant is estimated as k 0 % 10 2 -10 5 m 2 /s for the b-Al 3 Mg 2 nano-layers under these experimental conditions. The activation energy for formation of the b-Al 3 Mg 2 nanolayers of Q % 80 kJ/mol is consistent with the reported value of ;86 kJ/mol for the formation of the b-Al 3 Mg 2 intermetallic phase using a solid-to-solid diffusion couple technique at elevated temperatures of 573-673 K. 62,63 The measured k 0 value in the present analysis is much higher than the reported value of k 0 % 2 Â 10 À6 m 2 /s 62,63 and this difference is due to the rapid diffusion associated with the enhanced concentration of vacancy-type defects due to the HPT processing. This conclusion agrees with recent reports demonstrating that the enhanced atomic diffusion in nanostructured material after equal-channel angular pressing (ECAP) is attributed to the introduction of extra free volumes due to the high population of lattice defects in the nanostructure.…”
Section: 44-47supporting
confidence: 87%
“…(6) with Q % 80 kJ/mol and taking temperatures from 300 to 423 K to allow for processing at room temperature and the temperature rise during HPT processing, the pre-exponential constant is estimated as k 0 % 10 2 -10 5 m 2 /s for the b-Al 3 Mg 2 nano-layers under these experimental conditions. The activation energy for formation of the b-Al 3 Mg 2 nanolayers of Q % 80 kJ/mol is consistent with the reported value of ;86 kJ/mol for the formation of the b-Al 3 Mg 2 intermetallic phase using a solid-to-solid diffusion couple technique at elevated temperatures of 573-673 K. 62,63 The measured k 0 value in the present analysis is much higher than the reported value of k 0 % 2 Â 10 À6 m 2 /s 62,63 and this difference is due to the rapid diffusion associated with the enhanced concentration of vacancy-type defects due to the HPT processing. This conclusion agrees with recent reports demonstrating that the enhanced atomic diffusion in nanostructured material after equal-channel angular pressing (ECAP) is attributed to the introduction of extra free volumes due to the high population of lattice defects in the nanostructure.…”
Section: 44-47supporting
confidence: 87%
“…In another study Brennan et al [38], using a polycrystalline Mg with a grain size of 30 to 60 µm, obtained a prefactor which is 4 orders of magnitude lower than their previous value. Based on the available data, although the activation barriers differ only by few tenths of an eV, there seems to be a clear disagreement in the values of prefactors obtained using experiments and theoretical values.…”
Section: Al Atom Diffusion In Mgmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…[37] To obtain Al atom diffusivities, Das et al [34], extrapolated interdiffusion coefficients in hcp Mg-Al solid solution to 0% Al concentration using Wagner's approach. [44] While Kammerer et al [36] (∼ 100 − 500 µm grain size) and Brennan et al [38] (∼ 30 − 60 µm grain size) extrapolated interdiffusion coefficients obtained using the Boltzmann-Matano method [45] to less than 1at.% Al concentration of Mg-Al solid solution using the Hall method [47]. Brennan et al [37] used depth profiling with secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) and, utilized the thin film method and the diffusion equation for the thin film solution to extract the Al atom diffusivities.…”
Section: Al Atom Diffusion In Mgmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…В работах [9][10][11] Рис. 2, 3 позволяют сравнить результаты лаборатор-ных и вычислительных экспериментов.…”
Section: результаты компьютерного моделирования и обсуждениеunclassified