2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10864-019-09321-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interdependent Group Contingencies Reduce Disruption in Alternative High School Classrooms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
20
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The reductions obtained with the teacher‐implemented GBG were similar to those reported by Joslyn et al () and Joslyn, Vollmer et al (), who used experimenter‐implemented GBG, and slightly greater than those reported by Sy et al (), who included both experimenter and elementary‐educator implementers. Figure compares outcomes from the current study to those obtained by Joslyn et al (); Joslyn, Vollmer et al (), and Sy et al regarding the average percentage reductions in problem behavior and scoring accuracy data. The data from these studies can be directly compared due to the similarities in the methods of GBG implementation and calculation of scoring accuracy.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The reductions obtained with the teacher‐implemented GBG were similar to those reported by Joslyn et al () and Joslyn, Vollmer et al (), who used experimenter‐implemented GBG, and slightly greater than those reported by Sy et al (), who included both experimenter and elementary‐educator implementers. Figure compares outcomes from the current study to those obtained by Joslyn et al (); Joslyn, Vollmer et al (), and Sy et al regarding the average percentage reductions in problem behavior and scoring accuracy data. The data from these studies can be directly compared due to the similarities in the methods of GBG implementation and calculation of scoring accuracy.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Percentage reduction in problem behavior and scoring accuracy for Classrooms 1‐3 compared to the data from Joslyn et al (), Joslyn, Vollmer et al (), and Sy et al ().…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Other GBG variations have been used but not systematically evaluated. For example, the original GBG divided the class into two teams, but subsequent researchers have used multiple teams (e.g., Spilt et al, 2013) or one team when the class size was small (e.g., Joslyn, Vollmer, & Kronfli, 2019). Studies have also varied in the ways that the criterion for winning the game has been selected (e.g., teacher-or experimenter-selected; Sy, Gratz, & Donaldson, 2016) or communicated to students.…”
Section: Procedural Variationsmentioning
confidence: 99%