Interdependence as the key for an ethical artificial autonomy

Abstract

Currently, the autonomy of artificial systems, robotic systems in particular, is certainly one of the most debated issues, both from the perspective of technological development and its social impact and ethical repercussions. While theoretical considerations often focus on scenarios far beyond what can be concretely hypothesized from the current state of the art, the term autonomy is still used in a vague or too general way. This reduces the possibilities of a punctual analysis of such an important issue, thus leading to often polarized positions (naive optimism or unfounded defeatism). The intent of this paper is to clarify what is meant by artificial autonomy, and what are the prerequisites that can allow the attribution of this characteristic to a robotic system. Starting from some concrete examples, we will try to indicate a way towards artificial autonomy that can hold together the advantages of developing adaptive and versatile systems with the management of the inevitable problems that this technology poses both from the viewpoint of safety and ethics. Our proposal is that a real artificial autonomy, especially if expressed in the social context, can only be achieved through interdependence with other social actors (human and otherwise), through continuous exchanges and interactions which, while allowing robots to explore the environment, guarantee the emergence of shared practices, behaviors, and ethical principles, which otherwise could not be imposed with a top-down approach, if not at the price of giving up the same artificial autonomy.

Grassroots Autonomy: A Laypersons' Perspective on Autonomy

“…Modern and feminist views on autonomy in particular, e.g., the autonomy-connectedness conception, stress the role of social identity, social interaction, and interdependence instead of independence (Bekker and van Assen, 2008 ; Pianca and Santucci, 2022 ). Other feminist authors highlight the need for independence in the sense of objectivity, meaning informed, flexible, and critical attachment to others while considering one's biography and interpretations (Cooke, 1999 ).…”

Comparative Evaluation of Mobile Platforms for Non-Structured Environments and Performance Requirements Identification for Forest Clearing Applications

“…The capacity of perception, reasoning and action of a human being is hard to match with robotic systems, but the capabilities of the human and the robot can complement each other [25]. Human-robot systems have been the subject of constant research, and the results have taken many shapes and forms, evolving from continuous human-controlled master-slave mechanisms to robots incorporating artificial intelligence under supervision of a human operator [26]. Intervention of a human in the operation loop generally improves the performance of the global system by increasing guidance accuracy, enhancing target identification, shortening processing time, reducing system complexity and handling unknown and unpredictable events that fully autonomous systems cannot deal with [27].…”

Approaches to assessing autonomy in behavior and self-report

“…Modern and feminist views on autonomy in particular, e.g., the autonomy-connectedness conception, stress the role of social identity, social interaction, and interdependence instead of independence Pianca and Santucci, 2022). Other feminist authors highlight the need for independence in the sense of objectivity, meaning informed, flexible, and critical attachment to others while considering one's biography and interpretations (Cooke, 1999).…”