32nd International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA'05)
DOI: 10.1109/isca.2005.34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interconnections in Multi-Core Architectures: Understanding Mechanisms, Overheads and Scaling

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
175
0
3

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 242 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
175
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Among others, Kumar et al [13] analyze several on-chip interconnection mechanisms and topologies, and quantify their area, power, and latency overheads. Their study concludes that the design choices for the interconnect have significant effect on the rest of the chip, potentially consuming a significant fraction of the real estate and power budget.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among others, Kumar et al [13] analyze several on-chip interconnection mechanisms and topologies, and quantify their area, power, and latency overheads. Their study concludes that the design choices for the interconnect have significant effect on the rest of the chip, potentially consuming a significant fraction of the real estate and power budget.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This higher throughput comes along with the advantage of lower bandwidth requirement. Core-to-core bandwidth is likely to be a bottleneck in future CMPs [12]. Hence our proposal is better suited for the NoC like interconnects in CMPs of the future.…”
Section: G Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reason for this choice is that such interconnects allow a straightforward implementation of coherence via snooping (bus) or directory at the shared cache level (crossbar). Unfortunately, as pointed out in [20], future technology scaling will lead to on-chip interconnects having different sets of tradeoffs and design issues than traditional off-chip interconnects. In particular, wire widths and the area required by connectors do not scale down at the same rate as other features shrink, which means that either the delay or the area overheads, or both, of buses and crossbars increase as process scales.…”
Section: Current Cmps and Coherence Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, wire widths and the area required by connectors do not scale down at the same rate as other features shrink, which means that either the delay or the area overheads, or both, of buses and crossbars increase as process scales. In fact, the detailed study in [20] clearly shows that the area and delay overheads of buses and crossbars will become prohibitively high in CMPs with more than 16 cores in 65nm and smaller processes.…”
Section: Current Cmps and Coherence Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation