2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2009.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intercomparison of thermal conductivity and thermal diffusivity methods for plastics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several methods, as reviewed elsewhere (Tritt & Weston, 2004) and (Rides et al, 2009), have been proposed and used for measurement of the thermal conductivity of polymers and composites. Classical steady-state methods measure the temperature difference across the specimens in response to an applied heating power, either as an absolute value or by comparison with a reference material put in series or in parallel to the sample to be measured.…”
Section: Methods For Thermal Conductivity Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods, as reviewed elsewhere (Tritt & Weston, 2004) and (Rides et al, 2009), have been proposed and used for measurement of the thermal conductivity of polymers and composites. Classical steady-state methods measure the temperature difference across the specimens in response to an applied heating power, either as an absolute value or by comparison with a reference material put in series or in parallel to the sample to be measured.…”
Section: Methods For Thermal Conductivity Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classical techniques to measure thermal conductivity may be regrouped in two main categories, namely steady-state and transient techniques [4] [5]. Steadystate approaches are usually based on parallel plate techniques such as the guarded hot plate [6] or guarded heat flow meter [7].…”
Section: Bibliographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous tests on glycerol samples carried out with the probes manufactured by the Thermophysical Laboratory of the University of Rome "Tor Vergata" led to similar results. A better accuracy can be obtaining by calibration [16][17], i.e. assuming a constant deviation due to thermal probe construction and properties, generally not perfectly known.…”
Section: Thermal Diffusivity and Specific Heatmentioning
confidence: 99%