2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intercomparison of the GOS approach, superposition T-matrix method, and laboratory measurements for black carbon optical properties during aging

Abstract: We perform a comprehensive intercomparison of the geometric-optics surface-wave (GOS) approach, the superposition T-matrix method, and laboratory measurements for optical properties of fresh and coated/aged black carbon (BC) particles with complex structures. GOS and T-matrix calculations capture the measured optical (i.e., extinction, absorption, and scattering) cross sections of fresh BC aggregates, with 5-20% differences depending on particle size. We find that the T-matrix results tend to be lower than the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
40
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They attributed the discrepancy to the morphology, i.e., the greater dependence on the fractal dimension than on the size of the primary spherules. While our results are consistent with their results that the T-matrix calculations underestimated the SSA values, the discrepancy is even larger if we use the refractive index of 1.95 + 0.79i used by He et al [65,66], which was suggested by Bond et al [2] for soot produced from the combustion of hydrocarbons and diesel. In fact, we have seen that the refractive index suggested by Bond, when used for biomass burning aerosols, further underestimated the SSA values.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…They attributed the discrepancy to the morphology, i.e., the greater dependence on the fractal dimension than on the size of the primary spherules. While our results are consistent with their results that the T-matrix calculations underestimated the SSA values, the discrepancy is even larger if we use the refractive index of 1.95 + 0.79i used by He et al [65,66], which was suggested by Bond et al [2] for soot produced from the combustion of hydrocarbons and diesel. In fact, we have seen that the refractive index suggested by Bond, when used for biomass burning aerosols, further underestimated the SSA values.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…He et al [65,66] showed that the two methods they used (Geometric-optics surface waves (GOS) and T-matrix) capture the measured optical properties, but with a 5-20% difference, and the highest difference being the calculations based on T-matrix. They attributed the discrepancy to the morphology, i.e., the greater dependence on the fractal dimension than on the size of the primary spherules.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The scattering component of the shell acts as a lens to focus more photons onto the core, thus increasing absorption (Borhen and Huffman, 1983;Bond et al, 2006). However, the degree of absorption enhancement is a strong function of the structure and geometry of the mixed particle as well as the core diameter and shell thickness (He et al, 2015(He et al, , 2016. Theoretical calculations (known as "core-shell Mie theory") and laboratory studies have estimated enhancements in absorption for a given BC mass of a factor of 1.3 to 2 (Schnaiter et al, 2003(Schnaiter et al, , 2005Zhang et al, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%